What unscrupulous attorneys do to win and how to fight back

What unscrupulous attorneys do to win and how to fight back

Having experienced a few legal dustups himself, columnist Rob Enderle warns you about some of the unscrupulous things attorneys will do to win, and explains what you can do to avoid expensive litigation.

Attorney changes

It is not uncommon to have to change attorneys during a case, particularly a long drawn-out one. You may find you need different skills, the attorney you are using my not have the time for you, may move, retire, get sick, or even pass.   Litigation can often be measured in years.   What often happens is that when you get a new attorney the other side will argue against decisions and agreements that were made prior are no longer valid and use this as an argument to significantly hamper discovery or move the case in their direction.   The way to overcome this is to either make sure you are fully up to speed on what has been agreed on and are in the room or on the call, or have both the old and new attorneys work the case for a transition period until the new attorneys are fully up to speed.


One thing you need to understand is that getting an attorney disbarred is really difficult.   Generally they either have to be caught stealing money from you or using someone in the capacity of an attorney who isn’t licensed. That’s about it, and even the process to complain about an attorney is pretty convoluted.   The result is that there are a lot of attorneys practicing law who aren’t particularly good at it and likely can’t spell ethics.  

You need to have solid recommendations for anyone you do use and you need to keep a close eye on things and catch them early because your recourse against an attorney’s misconduct is very limited. Even the enforcement of disclosure rules appears pretty arbitrary. Ideally, you want good attorneys on both sides because you’ll likely get to an agreement faster. A bad attorney on either side is just a money hole.   But if a bad attorney is in the mix, having them on the other side is vastly less costly than having them on your side.  

Negotiate reasonable contracts at the get-go to avoid expensive litigation

Litigation is a very expensive undertaking and if you take away one thing realize that two parties typically enter into litigation both thinking their right and one side is invariably wrong. You can save a ton of money if you make sure you avoid getting into legal battles when you are on the wrong side. This means that from an ethics standpoint negotiating contracts that are reasonable for both sides can be far more profitable and less stressful than constantly trying to creatively take advantage of your opponent.

In addition, and as I noted above, contracts are best when they are in the best interest of both parties. Some of the longest and most expensive court battles I’ve ever seen are between parties who believed the other side signed an unreasonable deal.   Or, modifying the rule to say “If it looks too good to be true, it probably will end up in nasty litigation,” should help keep you from contracts you never should have signed in the first place.

Merry Christmas, here is hoping you don’t have to spend any time in court in the New Year.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about

Show Comments