Menu
Media releases are provided as is by companies and have not been edited or checked for accuracy. Any queries should be directed to the company itself.

VeCommerce Identity Verification Study Finds PINs and Passwords No Longer Offer Enough Protection

  • 09 April, 2008 06:18

<p>Sydney, 9 April 2008</p>
<p>For as long as we can remember, most of us have been satisfied that our personal identification number (PIN) and passwords provided an adequate level of protection against fraud and identity theft.</p>
<p>However our attitudes are changing. New technology such as biometric voice identification is favoured over the older personal identification methods when dealing with organisations such as banks, airlines and insurance companies, according to a new survey conducted by Sydney-based callcentres.net on behalf of VeCommerce.</p>
<p>People are also willing to pass through complex identification processes, especially women, the survey found.</p>
<p>Online surveys were completed by 216 Australian men and women for the VeCommerce Identity Verification Study. The study aimed to understand the public’s usage of and attitude towards processes used by organisations to verify identity.</p>
<p>Participants were asked to indicate whether they agreed, disagreed or had no opinion about statements relating to identity theft, sharing personal information and the use of technologies.</p>
<p>They were also asked to rate different methods of identity confirmation as vulnerable to theft or secure.</p>
<p>People of all ages are concerned about the security of their PIN numbers and passwords when they are used to confirm their identities to an organisation over the phone.</p>
<p>According to the survey, only 24% of people between 18 and 30 years of age (Generation Y) felt that revealing their PIN number was a secure method of confirming their identity over the phone, followed by a password (20%) and answering a personal details or history question (13%).</p>
<p>People between 31 and 45 years of age (Generation X) were even less convinced. Only 6% of people in this group believed that their password was secure, followed by providing personal details or a history question (10%) and PIN number (15%).</p>
<p>Instead, biometric voice identification was the preferred method of identification for 45% of men and 39% of women. 41% of Generation Y preferred biometrics. 41% of Generation X also preferred biometrics and 44% of people aged 46+ years (baby boomers).</p>
<p>Dr. Catriona Wallace, Managing Director of callcentres.net commented: “Identity theft and fraud is an issue for consumers we research. The results of this study suggest not only for younger consumer but across all age groups advanced technology such as biometric voice identification appears to be a viable and preferred option to more traditional methods such as PINs and passwords.”</p>
<p>Overall, 63% of respondents mostly or strongly agreed that fraud and identity theft was a concern. 58% had been more careful about sharing personal information over the past two years and 47% felt uncomfortable about providing details over the phone to a call centre representative. 33% said they would feel more secure working with an organisation that employed biometric identification rather than a PIN or password system.</p>
<p>A further 37% mostly or strongly agreed that they would be willing to pay for a product or service to a company that is very proactive in securing their personal information. A smaller group (22%) said the more technology an organisation uses, the more they feel secure.</p>
<p>“The survey results highlight the increasing impact that security is having on the customer experience. High-profile instances of identity theft are leading Australian consumers to review their own situations and demand greater protection of their personal data from their suppliers,” said Paul Magee, Managing Director, VeCommerce. “In a call centre environment, asking a customer a series of questions to verify their identity can be as frustrating for the caller as being kept on hold for an extended period”</p>
<p>Other survey findings included:</p>
<p>• PIN and password frustration. Many people surveyed agree that the use of PINs and passwords is frustrating, particularly baby boomer respondents (24%). Overall, 30% of respondents slightly agreed, mostly agreed or strongly agreed that it was frustrating and 24% agreed it was time consuming.</p>
<p>• Gender differences. The survey found that 75% of women are concerned about fraud and identity theft compared to 51% for men. Over the past two years, 69% of women have been more careful about sharing personal information and 44% would be willing to pay more for a product or service to a company that is very proactive in securing their personal information, compared to 47% and 29% for men respectively.</p>
<p>• Complexity welcome. Almost half (47%) of respondents preferred organisations to use a fairly complex process with fairly high security for identification while 17% preferred a very complex process with very high security. Only 2% wanted a simple or fairly simple process of identification.</p>
<p>• Vulnerability (SMS messaging). 51% of respondents believed that using an SMS confirmation to confirm their identity was quite vulnerable, very vulnerable or totally vulnerable to theft. Many people believed that someone else may have access to a computer or mobile phone (41%) or their information could be stolen or a computer hacked (31%) when they send an SMS message.</p>
<p>• Vulnerability (answering personal questions). 52% of respondents felt that answering a personal details or transaction history question over the phone meant their details were totally vulnerable, very vulnerable or quite vulnerable to theft, followed by a password (45%) or a PIN number (39%).</p>
<p>“It’s no surprise that both men and women are demanding that organisations have more complex security measures in place, said Magee. “The fact that people feel their details are not secure is certainly not helping to improve the customer experience.</p>
<p>“Identity theft is a serious crime which causes a great deal of pain and inconvenience for its victims.”</p>
<p>About VeCommerce
VeCommerce assists organisations deliver exceptional customer interactions. This is achieved through a detailed analysis of existing customer processes and the development and provision of applications that utilise speech recognition, voice biometrics and other related interaction technologies.</p>
<p>VeCommerce has developed voice self-service solutions since 1998 and today is one of the most experienced and successful application developers and systems integrators in the industry focusing on automated and scalable voice enabled caller identification and verification (ID&amp;V) solutions.</p>
<p>The company’s focus on research and development and provision of best-of-breed business solutions delivery has rewarded the organisation with a number of industry innovations, including: the first project to develop an Australia/New Zealand phonetic language model, the world's first natural language wagering solution launched commercially, and the first voice self-service real-time credit card bill payment system.</p>
<p>Customers include AAPT, Australian Health Management, BOC Gases, Pizza Hut, Standard Life, Suncorp, St George Bank, TABCorp, TelstraClear and the Inland Revenue Department (New Zealand). The company has offices in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and US.</p>
<p>For further information, please visit http://www.vecommerce.com</p>
<p>About callcentres.net
callcentres.net Pty Ltd is a research, analyst and online publishing business dedicated to the Asia Pacific contact centre and outsourcing industries, based in Sydney and Singapore.</p>
<p>For more information please see: www.callcentres.net</p>

Most Popular

Market Place