Menu
Menu
It's Not Your IT Portfolio - It's Theirs

It's Not Your IT Portfolio - It's Theirs

CIOs who think they should be in charge of selecting IT projects are asking for a very short career, according to Ace Hardware's CIO.


The Path to Longevity

At Ace, we have a defined approach that assures that our plan is aligned with our strategy and everybody is involved in the process. The steps we go through each year are as follows.

1. In early spring, I meet with a select group of IT and user managers to develop a high-level view of strategic systems for the next five years. This exercise assures that the large systems that we want to develop will be understood across the company. This document is shared with the top corporate officers and the board.

2. Beginning in midyear, IT meets with all the user departments and specifically defines what needs to be done during the upcoming year. This discussion is based on the current year's accomplishments along with the new long-range plan.

3. Late in the US summer, these requirements are all prioritised and presented to a committee composed of two officers (whom we rotate) and several users who are all aware of the corporate strategic plan. The group finalises a recommendation based on fulfilling that plan.

4. The recommendation is then presented to the IT steering committee, composed of the top corporate officers, for final approval. At this meeting, priorities can be adjusted, staff can be added, and projects can be added or deleted. Sometimes certain projects are scrapped in favour of more pressing demands. This can be done only with the top decision makers sitting around the table, and it is rare for someone to miss the meeting. The outcome is a final plan for IT that is used to develop the budget for the next year. This year, the plan consists of almost 150 projects. The senior executive I mentioned earlier was able to make a great case for the ongoing support of his supply chain initiatives, and he actually received more support than he had asked for in his original proposal.

Each month a status report on these projects is published online and describes each project and its stage of completion. The report also shows the current estimated cost, the cost expended to date and the date the project moves to the next stage.

In this manner we get each department involved in the automation agenda. The CIO does not pick the projects and thus is not put into the position of selecting one department over another. It seems to me that CIOs who are put in that position are asking for a very short career. Line management should have the authority and responsibility to make these decisions.

Now the first reaction to what I've said might be: how can you expect user managers to know what they need in this fast-paced world of IT? That is indeed an issue. And it goes to the heart of what is the role of the CIO and his staff, which is to be a mentor of sorts when it comes to technology. We in IT must be aware of new and existing technologies that could be valuable in a given user situation. One of the CIO's most important roles is to predict the technology future and sell the concept to user management.

Here is how I would summarise the other responsibilities of the CIO:

1. Provide technical assistance to the long-range planning process.

2. Maintain a stable computer and network infrastructure.

3. Ensure that the infrastructure is secure.

4. Ensure that projects are completed on time and budget.

5. Maintain a stable workforce.

Nowhere did I mention determining what systems we should automate. If the company decides that all resources should be devoted to a financial system, that's OK. As long as the officers agree, IT should not care.

I first got into IT in 1965 at a data processing service bureau working after school. The environment was much simpler then. IT was a way to automate some existing processes and make them easier to use. There wasn't much strategy involved. Today, things are vastly different. Oftentimes, IT is the strategy. In this environment, strategy and how we execute it is too important to entrust it only to IT. In fact IT should not want to accept this burden. That is a job for everyone.

Paul Ingevaldson is senior vice president of international business and technology for Ace Hardware, a $US3 billion cooperative serving the wholesale and retail needs of more than 5000 Ace Hardware stores in the United States and 70 countries

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about BillionEntrustHISStrategic Systems

Show Comments
Computerworld
ARN
Techworld
CMO