Menu
Menu
The Telecomms Roller Coaster

The Telecomms Roller Coaster

While US CIOs grapple with the aftermath of recent telecomms mega-mergers and their effect on existing voice and data contracts, their Australian counterparts are facing similar dilemmas amid a rapidly changing landscape

In Australia, telcos are shaping up, shipping out or looking for a slice, and CIOs intend to use that to their advantage.

While US CIOs grapple with the aftermath of recent telecomms mega-mergers and their effect on existing voice and data contracts, their Australian counterparts are facing similar dilemmas amid a rapidly changing landscape.

Unlike the US where consolidation is rampant, the local market is a mix of burgeoning second-tier carriers and larger suppliers that are either shedding staff to remain competitive or putting up "for sale" signs. One thing they have in common is a hunger for a slice of Telstra's pie, which they express mostly by spruiking convergence as a path around the Big T's last-mile monopoly - and towards better value for customers.

Bank of Queensland CIO and head of technology Nick Young says the question he and other CIOs face is: when will enterprises be able to move to faster, cheaper services? With a cloud of uncertainty over Telstra, Young is hopeful this will be the year that CIOs finally get access to better services to meet the demand for low-cost bandwidth.

"That's the challenge we all have," Young says, adding the Bank of Queensland is "fortunate" to be able to operate on low bandwidth infrastructure because of its application architecture. "We've been able to manage at a lower bandwidth than our competitors but face the same issues - customers want access to more services and we are always looking at ways we can give them that without blowing costs out," he says. "It's difficult to do long-term planning when you have that coming, but I'm hoping over the coming months it will become clearer."

In the bank's case, Young is forced to be pragmatic with carrier selection in the interest of providing services to a geographically dispersed customer base. "You need someone with capability to get to all end points and we have hundreds of them," he says. "Certainly, there are ways you can go at looking at different providers for different services and go at it from a business benefit [viewpoint]." Young claims that the amount of benefit sits somewhere between "the size of the impact" and not multi-sourcing services "for the sake of it".

Given the increased likelihood for larger organizations to multi-source, this also means a higher prospect of billing inaccuracies, which Young says there is "no magic" to alleviating. "Sit down and make sure you have appropriate governance in the company and make sure you are getting charged the right rates for the services," Young says. "Otherwise, you will spend too much money."

The rising tide of competition has allowed CIOs to vote with their feet to avoid inflated pricing regimes, but even so, Young believes moving carriers is still a big decision. "It's certainly not a world where you can just flick a switch and be with another provider," he says. "With the complexity of the world we operate in, especially a bank, it's simply not possible."

Another issue is contract length, which Young says also needs to be approached as a trade-off. The usual rule is: the longer the period of your contract, the better the deal, since the provider gets the benefit of certainty that comes with long-term business. However, Young says that CIOs looking to use the threat of switching carriers after negotiating a short-term contract need to have realistic expectations about service levels and pricing, which would be better under a longer contract.

Amid all the challenges that managing voice and data services presents to today's CIOs, Young remains optimistic about the future of a constantly diversifying market. "We're waiting to see what the new Telstra is like," he says. "And also how that impacts the competitive positioning of Telstra's competitors and how they respond to changes that occur at Telstra."

Not surprisingly, Young says CIOs will be very happy if they get better services and lower costs as a result of the changes.

Two Carriers at Once

Banking and financial services company Suncorp is also combing a multitude of options for its communications requirements and, like the Bank of Queensland, its complex network ensures that obtaining a single pipe for all its needs remains a distant hope.

Suncorp's general manager of IT infrastructure services Paul Cameron says a dramatically changing market has forced Telstra to reconsider its value proposition. "When Telstra was the dominant monopoly everything was provided off catalogues," Cameron says. "Now there is competition with the likes of Optus and PowerTel."

Cameron agrees with Young that a change of service provider does not simply involve "flicking a switch", but he chooses to encourage competition by using two carriers simultaneously. "We have a core 'metro' network and the WAN," he says. "There's plenty of separation so you can use separate carriers. You can churn. That never used to occur before; now you don't have to buy [from] the Big T."

Cameron is a firm believer in negotiating shorter two-year contracts to "survey the market" and to keep abreast of the changing face of telecomms. "Technology moves quickly - a good example of that is with ADSL2+ - so you're getting more bang-for-buck," he says. "You see little shop fronts that are agile and move flexibly. Telstra has no other option but to compete at that level."

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

More about Bank of QLDBillFinancial InstitutionsmobilesOptusPowerTelSuncorp GroupTelstra CorporationViewpoint

Show Comments

Market Place

Computerworld
ARN
Techworld
CMO
<img height="1" width="1" style="border-style:none;" alt="" src="//insight.adsrvr.org/track/evnt/?adv=bitgblf&ct=0:dn998liw&fmt=3"/>