Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Forget Everything You've Learnt About Project Delivery!

Our current project delivery paradigms are flawed. And so are our approaches to solving this problem. The first in a new 10-part series from project management expert Jed Simms

The Challenge

Depending on their definitions of "success", the research consistently shows that only between 3-5 percent and 35 percent of projects are rated as successful. This means that around 2 in 3 of projects started will not be rated successful on the most generous definitions.

The really frightening aspect of these statistics is that they haven't improved since the first such study by AD Little in 1991.

I've been studying this topic — why do projects so often "fail" on one dimension or another — for 18 years. The results have shown that our current project delivery paradigms are flawed. Also, our approaches to solving this problem are flawed.

The most common reaction in the past 15 years is to address the symptoms, to try to avoid the issues and do anything but address the root causes.

Many organizations think they can solve the project delivery problems by doing what they do today only better. But you need to challenge the norms that pervade the project delivery industry.

It's time to accept that there is something fundamentally wrong with how we direct, control and deliver projects.

Project delivery approaches are like jigsaw pictures where the design of one piece dictates how other pieces need to be designed to fit together. Efforts to improve project delivery performance — by changing the design of one or more jigsaw pieces — rarely works well as you then have gaps and mismatches with the remaining project delivery pieces.

We need to not only change the design of the jigsaw pattern, we need to change the picture of project delivery it creates too.

There are 10 dimensions to project delivery and most are done poorly. It is not that those doing the activities are shirking their roles, but that the tools and approaches they are given are inadequate.

You need to accept the need to change and that many aspects of what you've always considered 'normal project delivery' need to either disappear or improve. Organizations need to make the changes and adopt newer, more mature approaches. And then measure the results — the increase in business value delivered, the reduced level of frustration with projects and the increased speed in which projects are delivered. Or, continue destroying value like you are today.

Some of the changes are significant, other changes are slight but have a dramatic effect. The danger is that stalwarts of the project delivery industry see these changes as incidental, of not having much impact. This is a false conclusion.

What we recommend is you try the different approaches and evaluate the results. As project managers you owe this to yourself as well as your organization.

Over the following few weeks we'll discuss each of the 10 dimensions and what needs to change.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: SIMMS, Simms International, Speed

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Disciplined Agile Delivery: An Introduction
    This evaluation guide is designed to help you choose the best tool to support your current Agile projects, while protecting your investment as your team, needs and agile maturity grow.
    Learn more »
  • Top Reasons to Implement an SOA Governance Strategy: A List for IT Executives
    Service-oriented architecture (SOA) has moved beyond hype to widespread acceptance as an IT strategy for delivering business value. SOA promotes the notion of modularity, providing overwhelming flexibility and superior economics for addressing business demands. However, undertaking the transformation to SOA is not without its challenges. If left unchecked, your inventory of SOA assets will become unmanageable; the reuse of services will diminish in favor of custom development; or even worse, modifications will be made to your existing services that break other business processes. The purpose of SOA governance is to help you ensure that this does not happen. This paper outlines the most compelling reasons for you to establish SOA governance within your organization.
    Learn more »
  • Yes. We. Can. Flexible Policy 2.0
    Social media may have changed the way we do business, but the rules of engagement are still the same. Dynamic business environments call for flexibility. Context is everything when it comes to deciding what information needs to be blocked or controlled, and when. Read this whitepaper.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments