Huawei seeks to counter security concerns
- 24 October, 2012 14:23
Huawei Australia’s chairman has said a national cyber security centre should be built to test technologies for infrastructure projects, such as the National Broadband Network (NBN).
The company's proposal is in response to a recent US congressional report that issued a warning about potential backdoors that could be exploited by Chinese state agencies and the ban on Huawei participation in construction of the NBN.
In a speech to the National Press Club today, John Lord said developing effective cyber security frameworks is not just a challenge for Huawei and it should be approached collaboratively.
“Nobody has got it right yet, and as the ICT industry continues to develop so rapidly, it will continue to be a challenge for agencies to keep up with the pace of change…” he said.
“Huawei is proposing the establishment of a national cyber security evaluation centre, to test the security credentials of technologies being implemented into critical infrastructure projects.”
The centre would include testing products and equipment for critical infrastructure projects, including the NBN.
The centre could be funded by vendors and operated by Australian citizens who had passed security clearance, Lord said. He said the cost of setting up such a centre would depend on the centre’s level of sophistication and that Huawei had not yet spoken to other non-Chinese vendors about whether they would behind such a project.
Huawei was banned from participating in the construction of the NBN because of security concerns.
Lord said that while Huawei was “disappointed” that it was unable to participate in the NBN, “we have accepted the government’s decision and we have moved on”.
“Of course we stand at the ready if the situation changes, but we respect the government’s right to make such determinations,” Lord said.
Lord took also a swipe at the US government’s House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence which recommended US telcos avoid deploying technology from Chinese vendors such as Huawei and ZTE because they may pose a security threat.
“We sincerely hope that in Australia, we do not allow sober debate on cyber security to become distorted the way it has in the US,” Lord said.
“The US committee report must be called for what it really is – protectionism, not security.”
Some observers have sided with Huawei, stating that the security concerns are paranoia and that the company is too big to risk its business this way.
Follow Stephanie McDonald on Twitter: @stephmcdonald0
Follow Computerworld Australia on Twitter: @ComputerworldAU
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
CIOs to Become In-House Brokers -- and That's a Good Thing
The future of computing
10 Hot Hadoop Startups to Watch
The future of computing
How to Switch From iPhone 5S to BlackBerry Z30 (and Why)
The F5 DDoS Protection Reference Architecture part 3 of 3
This whitepaper is the third in a three-part series on distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) and multi-tier DDoS protection. This section refers to case studies of different approaches to deploying protection architecture, including an enterprise customer scenario, an FSI customer scenario and an SMB customer scenario. The paper explains how these options should provide the flexibility and needed to combat the modern DDoS threat.
Simple, Proven, Tranformative
A cheat Sheet for Google Apps for Business
Pathways Advanced ICT Leadership Development Program Course Outline and Big 6 2013
Developed by the CIO executive Council in conjunction with Rob Livingstone Advisory, Pathways Advanced is a 12-month CIO delivered, small group, mentor based professional leadership development program. Pathways Advanced brings together best practice, thought leadership and business insights for today’s most promising ICT professionals