Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Data retention: Who wants it, who doesn't and why

Several companies and organisations have now appeared at four public hearings into intelligence and security reform proposals.

The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security is currently conducting an inquiry into reforms to Australia’s interception and security legislation.

The inquiry relates to the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979; Telecommunications Act 1997; Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979; and Intelligence Services Act 2001 and began in July this year.

One of the most contentious aspects of the terms of reference include "tailored data retention periods for up to two years for parts of a data set, with specific timeframes taking into account agency priorities and privacy and cost impacts".

However, the committee is also examining modernising intelligence access to communications data, enhancing the operational capacity of intelligence agencies and mitigating the risks posed by foreign technology and service suppliers.

It will look at security risks posed to the telecommunications sector and whether the government needs to introduce measures which the telco industry would need to implement in order to protect their networks from unauthorised interference.

“It is vital that our security laws keep pace with the rapid developments in technology,” Anthony Byrne, chair of the committee, has said.

The inquiry has ignited fierce debate around data retention, with the Attorney-General, Nicola Roxon, stating that police investigations would be unable to create a picture of criminal activity without data retention laws.

“We’re no longer just dealing with guards and gates, bombs and bullets when we talk about defending our nation and its secrets. We’re now fairly and squarely working in an online environment,” she has said. “And this has created a whole new dimension of both opportunity and threat.”

A total of four public hearings have now been held, with another hearing to be held tonight with the Attorney-General’s Department.

Computerworld Australia took a look some of the statements from organisations and companies at the hearing in the for and against case for the proposals and also some of the statements from the committee.

The arguments for data retention.

The arguments against data retention.

Statements from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security.

Follow Stephanie McDonald on Twitter: @stephmcdonald0

Follow Computerworld Australia on Twitter: @ComputerworldAU

Related Articles

  1. From CMO to CEO: Anametrix’s Pelin Thorogood

    CMO

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

References show all
Comments are now closed.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Saving Time and Money with Savvy Use of Flash in Automated Storage Tiering
    In a sluggish economy, getting the best ROI on every IT dollar spent is the top priority for almost every business. Storage budgets in most IT environments continue to remain flat or are capped as a percentage of the overall IT spend, while data storage requirements continue to grow at an unsustainable pace. Download now to learn about the benefits of using flash in automated storage tiering.
    Learn more »
  • HP Helps NEC Reduce Network Management Costs and Gain Efficiencies
    NEC wanted to reduce network management costs, while increasing network visibility, decreasing mean-time-to-repair, improving stability and mitigating the risk of downtime. Download today to hear from Cameron Craig, Senior department manager of NEC on what approach they took and why.
    Learn more »
  • Leading Through Connections – Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officer Study
    IBM’s 2012 Global CEO study follows face-to-face discussions with more than 1,700 CEOs and senior public sector leaders from around the globe. The findings examine how CEOs are responding to the complexity of increasingly interconnected organisations, markets, societies and governments. For example, almost one-quarter of CEOs say their organisations operate below par in terms of driving value from data. CEOs have expressed frustration about their inability to capitalise on available information. This is because: “The time available to capture, interpret and act on information is getting shorter and shorter.” CEO, Chemicals and Petroleum, United States Given the need for deeper business insight, the best performing organisations are more adept at converting complex data into insights, and insights into action. Download Entire Report Now.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments