Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Wednesday Grok: Google chases paid inclusion, the very evil it once spurned

“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which” — Animal Farm, George Orwell

Google just can’t help itself. It’s like a drunk stumbling into a bar, or a junkie with his bony fingers clamped tightly around a fresh new 50 dollar note. The search engine giant seems determined to self-immolate. Forget about anti-trust for the time being, we’re talking instead about the debasement of its core product.

It’s hardly a secret that Google has been openly abandoning the principles that made it successful and its pioneers spectacularly wealthy.

And the journey continues to unfold with Google soon to “make ads for certain kinds of products look like search results,” according to Business Insider which itself references a report in Search Engine Land. This is an approach to search known as paid inclusion. It was popular with advertisers before Google burst on the scene years ago and made it very unpopular.

As the BI article noted, Google told investors before it floated, “We will do our best to provide the most relevant and useful search results possible, independent of financial incentives. Our search results will be objective and we will not accept payment for inclusion or ranking in them.” Indeed. The Search Engine Land article said initially paid inclusion will be applied to flight searches, financial product searches and hotel searches. There are examples of the old and new approach in the report which tells the story better than all the words.

Of course these initial three categories are just the start. Once and for all, you can forget all about "don't be evil". We are no longer debating what Google does for a living; we are simply negotiating a price.

Some wars aren’t worth fighting

By all accounts, Oracle is getting totally pwned in its court case with Google at the moment. The argument is over Google’s use of Java in Android — only in the IT industry does that sentence make any sense.

Specifically, it’s about whether Google violated copyright on IP acquired by Oracle as a result of Oracle's purchase of Sun Microsystems.

Google.

Copyright.

Violation.

Those three words are so unlikely to ever appear together in any context so we decided to give them separate paragraphs.

SmartMoney said Google has it in the bag. And Oracle certainly wasn’t helped by the testimony of former Sun Microsystems CEO, Jonathan Schwartz.

According to Readwriteweb , Schwartz testified, “In addition to saying that Sun never charged for Java APIs, ... Sun’s goal for Java when the language was created in the mid-to-late 1990s was to build an open-source universal language that was not reliant on Microsoft or Windows. Giving the APIs away for free was the only way to do that.”

It seems pretty cut and dried from all the way down here, Larry.

Microsoft decides it’s time to get into e-readers

Finally, Microsoft has sunk $300 million into a joint venture with Barnes and Noble to buy itself a place in the e-reader game. B&N will spin out its Nook e-reader along with its college business, according to Business Insider, which also noted that the Microsoft investment values the JV at $1.7 billion compared to the value of B&N itself at just a pinch under $800 million.

Andrew Birmingham is the CEO of Silicon Gully Investments. Follow him on Twitter @ag_birmingham.

Related Articles

  1. CMO interview: Becoming a change agent

    CMO

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Andrew, Barnes and Noble, Google, Microsoft, Noble, Oracle, Sun Microsystems
References show all

Comments

Stuart

1

What do you mean by Google, Copyright & Violation not being used together in any context? Is that meant to be sarcasm?
The entire Android OS was based off stolen IP. The majority of vendors using the "free OS" have since come to terms with Microsoft to license the patents breached by the use of Android and Apple is waging a patent war against Google directly for copying patented features within iOS

Comments are now closed.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Saving Time and Money with Savvy Use of Flash in Automated Storage Tiering
    In a sluggish economy, getting the best ROI on every IT dollar spent is the top priority for almost every business. Storage budgets in most IT environments continue to remain flat or are capped as a percentage of the overall IT spend, while data storage requirements continue to grow at an unsustainable pace. Download now to learn about the benefits of using flash in automated storage tiering.
    Learn more »
  • Pathways Advanced ICT Leadership Development Program Course Outline and Big 6 2013
    Developed by the CIO executive Council in conjunction with Rob Livingstone Advisory, Pathways Advanced is a 12-month CIO delivered, small group, mentor based professional leadership development program. Pathways Advanced brings together best practice, thought leadership and business insights for today’s most promising ICT professionals
    Learn more »
  • How the Cloud Changes the Game for Line of Business Managers in Midsize Companies
    It can be argued that what distinguishes midsize businesses most from large and small companies is not size, but attitude. While attitude alone cannot mitigate the challenges faced by midsize businesses, technology can help. And no technology offers more promise than the cloud. This paper, explores midsize business challenges from the perspective, not of the IT department, but of the line of business managers they support. Read on.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments