Project portfolio management - Part 2
- 07 March, 2012 14:48
Project management suffered an identity crisis half a decade ago, when ever-more-empowered developers were learning to work directly with their business patrons as Agile development philosophies encouraged developers to co-ordinate their activities in tight-knit teams that regularly report, evaluate, reassess and re-plan their short-term strategies.
When developers work side by side with business owners, project managers become a third wheel. Without change, some observers warned, the discipline of project management would die out altogether as its functions were subsumed by other roles. And change it did: Supported by a range of tools, PPM’s combination of breadth and depth have made it essential for the successful execution and monitoring of projects in all kinds of industries.
PPM complements tried-and-true project management nous with technologies capable of not only tracking project status forms, but of informing the process through proactive analytics and better forward planning. If business reporting tools provide a good view of where the company is now, properly constructed PPM can provide clarity as to where the company and its resources will be one year from now, or five.
While its value might seem obvious to technical staff, a recent Forrester Research-Project Management Institute survey (see Image 1) found PMOs reporting to vice-presidents of IT actually have the hardest time proving PPM’s value; PMOs reporting to the CIO do better, while PMOs reporting to business leaders are perceived as having strong value.
Rapidly shifting business conditions are giving PMOs new ways to prove PPM’s value. As VHA learned, intelligent use of PPM systems helped break down organisational silos with ready access to progress metrics, prefabricated analytics to highlight project issues, and proactive planning capabilities that can drive better outcomes.
Many companies are using the technological freedoms to try new approaches such as the creation of communities of practice (CoPs), in which project teams work together in a semi-autonomous situation while the PMO steps back and waits for results.
This approach minimises the sense of top-down interference while maintaining visibility and allowing the organisation to take advantage of disintermediating Agile practices. It also helps increase perceptions of PPM’s value, drives education to business stakeholders who don’t understand their role in projects, and improves and refines the usage of relevant tools.
However, as always, realising these benefits depends on strong business support.
“With executive support,” Forrester Research analyst Margo Visitacion recently wrote in a manifesto for PMO change, “the new PMO strips away inessentials and takes a less hierarchical approach to projects, embracing communities of practice to develop pragmatic methods that are consistent, measurable and effective.”
Visitacion sees PMOs converging into several key types: Tactical, which are organisationally static and focused on consistency; strategic, which are less hands on, have wider organisational support and foster more CoPs; and transformational, which “fully integrate into the company’s project planning and delivery… while the PMO places great emphasis on standardisation, the community must recognise and refine individual practices.”
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
Why change management doesn’t work
Larry Page wants to see your medical records
Dual-Persona Smartphones Not a BYOD Panacea
After two-year hiatus, EFF accepts bitcoin donations again
CIOs struggle to deliver timely mobile business apps: survey
Leading Through Connections – Insights from the Global Chief Executive Officer Study
IBM’s 2012 Global CEO study follows face-to-face discussions with more than 1,700 CEOs and senior public sector leaders from around the globe. The findings examine how CEOs are responding to the complexity of increasingly interconnected organisations, markets, societies and governments. For example, almost one-quarter of CEOs say their organisations operate below par in terms of driving value from data. CEOs have expressed frustration about their inability to capitalise on available information. This is because: “The time available to capture, interpret and act on information is getting shorter and shorter.” CEO, Chemicals and Petroleum, United States Given the need for deeper business insight, the best performing organisations are more adept at converting complex data into insights, and insights into action. Download Entire Report Now.
Unleashing the Power of Information
If business-relevant information is not well managed, secured and analysed, it can become an underutilized asset or—worst case—a legal and competitive liability. Nearly all of the IT and business executives who responded to a recent survey recognise this risk, and say they understand the importance of having an enterprise information management (EIM) strategy. Find out more on how to reduce costs, improve competitiveness and avoid risk by making information management an enterprisewide strategic priority.
Spear-Phishing Email: Most Favored APT Attack Bait
This research paper presents findings on APT-related spear phishing from February to September 2012. We analysed APT-related spear-phishing emails collected throughout this period to understand and mitigate attacks. The information we gathered not only allowed us to obtain specific details on spear phishing but also on targeted attacks. We found, for instance, that 91% of targeted attacks involve spear-phishing emails, reinforcing the belief that spear phishing is a primary means by which APT attackers infiltrate target networks.