IT pros believe data breach harm assessment is more valuable than victim notification, study says
- 26 January, 2012 04:27
- Comments
IT professionals believe that assessing the potential harm caused by data breaches is more useful to mitigating the effects of such incidents than notifying affected individuals, according to a survey published on the day the European Union's proposed a 24-hour deadline for data breach disclosures.
Entitled "Aftermath of a Data Breach," the study was sponsored by information services company Experian and was conducted by the Ponemon Institute, which surveyed 584 experienced IT professionals working for companies that suffered a data breach involving consumer records during the past 24 months.
The questions asked by the Ponemon Institute tried to establish the circumstances leading to the data breach, the company's response and the incident's impact on the affected organization's data protection practices.
One of the study's most interesting conclusions was that while notifying victims and regulators are the most common steps taken by companies in the aftermath of a data breach, IT professionals don't view them as the most important actions for reducing the negative consequences of such incidents.
Only 6 percent of survey participants said that victim notification is helpful for reducing the impact of a breach, a significant change of opinion compared to 2007 when 54 percent of IT professionals chose it as an important mitigation step.
Retaining outside legal counsel, carefully assessing the harm to victims and hiring forensic experts to investigate the breach were viewed as the most valuable actions a company can take in the aftermath of a breach by approximately half of respondents.
By comparison, contracting computer forensic experts was considered important by only 5 percent of survey participants in 2007. This suggests that IT professionals today are much more interested in learning how a breach happened before taking action.
Legislators in both the U.S. and the European Union are pushing for legislation that would require companies to alert victims about data breaches in a more timely and uniform manner.
The European Commission proposed significant changes to the E.U.'s data protection laws Wednesday that include a 24-hour deadline for companies to report data breaches. While the proposal was largely welcomed by consumer protection groups, it attracted criticism from the U.S. Department of Commerce and business associations, which described the deadline as too short.
The Aftermath of a Data Breach survey also revealed that, despite making improvements to their data breach response practices, companies still have a long way to go as far as prevention is concerned. Only half of respondents believed that their companies made the best possible effort to protect customer and consumer information in advance of a data breach.
Negligent staff, disgruntled employees and third-party contractors remain the primary source of data breaches. Despite the large wave of cyberattacks that targeted companies last year, only 7 percent of respondents named such attacks as the cause for a data breach in their organization.
According to the study, companies continue to avoid offering free credit monitoring or identity protection services to data breach victims, and when such services do get offered, they rarely exceed periods of one year.
Nearly half of respondents said that their companies suffered data breaches that involved log-in credentials and credit card or bank payment information. Sixty percent of them said that the data was not encrypted, while 16 percent were unsure.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
Australia's first 4G smartphone is the HTC Velocity 4G
-
Swedish e-commerce startup's execs linked to NYC sex crime
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
How to implement next-generation storage infrastructure for Big Data
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
10 Essential Steps to Email Security
Modern business is reliant on email. All organisations using email need to answer the following questions: How do we control spam volumes without the risk of trapping a business email? How do we prevent infections from email-borne viruses? How do we stop leakage of confidential information? Can we detect and stop exploitation from phishing attacks? How do we control brand damage from occurring due to employee misuse? How do we prevent inappropriate content from being circulated? -
Oracle Business Process Analysis Suite
Careful analysis and continuous optimization of business processes delivers real competitive advantage. Conversely, a random approach to process design negatively impacts a company’s bottom line. This insight is one reason successful companies adopt business process management (BPM) as a way of aligning their business processes with business and customer requirements. Success with BPM eliminates the gap between business strategy and implementation. Business users are empowered to participate in all stages of the business process lifecycle. Closed-loop integration between modeling, execution, and monitoring enables continuous and holistic business process improvement. -
Reducing Costs Through Better Server Utilisation
By consolidating systems onto the latest server technology and taking advantage of virtualization techniques, enterprises can optimize datacenter efficiency, gain flexibility, and reduce operating costs—without sacrificing performance or impacting service levels. Read on.
-
Beginning Sharepoint 2010 Development
-
Windows Vista Visual Quick Tips
-
C Programming Study Guide
-
Introducing 3Ds Max 2008
-
Microsoft Office XP Step By Step Courseware
-
Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-v
-
Building Secure Wireless Networks with 802.11
-
Java 2
-
Web Content Mining with Java - Techniques for Exploiting the Worlds Biggest Information Resource








Comments
Post new comment