Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Aussie firms lack disaster plans for IT

If you don't have a plan, you're going to lose many, many hours, if not many, many days. That will be very, very expensive for the company.

Many Australian businesses have no plan for how they will start work again following a disaster, says flexible workspace provider Regus.

Businesses affected by natural disasters could face huge financial costs, but smaller incidents such as vandalism, theft of company data and power outages can also have a serious impact.

Regus said in a study released on Tuesday that almost one in three Australian businesses had no disaster recovery plan for their information technology.

And one in two businesses had no continuity plan for their workspace requirements.

"Time is critical. When you have to recover from a disaster, if you don't have a plan, you have to expend energy asking where are we going to go now," Regus regional vice-president of Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia, William Willems, said.

"That's going to cost you a lot of money. You have to set up board meetings and go through the decision-making process.

"If you don't have a plan, you're going to lose many, many hours, if not many, many days. That will be very, very expensive for the company."

The Regus study found that small businesses in Australia were less prepared than bigger ones.

Thirty-six per cent of small businesses lacked a disaster recovery system to revive computer systems within 24 hours, compared to 16 per cent of larger firms.

"The research reveals that in spite of reports indicating the average incident can cost up to $US500,000, disaster recovery plans among Australian businesses is not as widespread as imagined, particularly when it comes to the workplace," Willems said.

"The flooding in Queensland in particular has been reported to be one of the costliest disasters in Australian history."

Regus surveyed more than 12,000 business people in 85 countries, including more than 400 senior business professionals in Australia, to ascertain their preparedness for disaster.

Globally, 55 per cent of businesses have no facility that ensures an alternative workspace is available within 24 hours. In Australia, 50 per cent of firms lack an alternative workspace.

Twenty-three per cent of Australian businesses thought the cost of disaster recovery facilities was too high, compared to 33 per cent of firms globally.

Fifty-four per cent of Australian respondents said they would invest in a workspace disaster recovery facility if the service were suitably priced, compared to 55 per cent globally.

In a city-by-city comparison, 72 per cent of firms in Sydney and Melbourne are likely to have an information technology recovery system up and running within 24 hours, compared to 67 per cent in Adelaide, 64 per cent in Brisbane and 63 per cent in Perth.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Regus

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: business, disaster recovery, Regus
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • SOA and Business Processes: Making the Connection
    Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) is also complex, and one of its main characteristics is that an SOA system is comprised of multiple applications that are combined to accomplish critical business processes. Discussions of SOA can quickly grow so complex that the system’s main benefits to an organization are difficult to fully understand. This article discusses SOA Suite 11g, a family of products that take SOA to a new level and correct some of the problems caused by the very combination of components and multiplication of languages that make SOA a flexible, agile system.
    Learn more »
  • TestPro achieves visibility over software defect management - Reducing project risk and improving quality
    In delivering specialised software testing products and services, TestPro aims to add value to its clients by assisting them to deliver software projects at a higher quality with less risk. It saw significant opportunity to reduce effort and resources during the product development life cycle.TestPro uses IBM Rational Team Concert software to help achieve greater visibility and reduce effort involved in managing product builds and defects during application development, maintenance and enhancement projects. Read more.
    Learn more »
  • Top Reasons to Implement an SOA Governance Strategy: A List for IT Executives
    Service-oriented architecture (SOA) has moved beyond hype to widespread acceptance as an IT strategy for delivering business value. SOA promotes the notion of modularity, providing overwhelming flexibility and superior economics for addressing business demands. However, undertaking the transformation to SOA is not without its challenges. If left unchecked, your inventory of SOA assets will become unmanageable; the reuse of services will diminish in favor of custom development; or even worse, modifications will be made to your existing services that break other business processes. The purpose of SOA governance is to help you ensure that this does not happen. This paper outlines the most compelling reasons for you to establish SOA governance within your organization.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.