Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Oracle demands January trial in Google-Android case

But Google maintains it might need to be delayed until July due to scheduling problems

Google and Oracle continue to differ over when their lawsuit over alleged Java intellectual property violations in the Android mobile OS should begin, according to a joint filing the companies made late Monday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Oracle referred to the "irreparable harm" being caused to Java by "the continued migration of device manufacturers and application developers from Java to Android" in requesting the trial begin on Jan. 20 or 23, after the scheduled Jan. 19 submission of an expert's damages report.

"For instance, Amazon's newly-released Kindle Fire tablet is based on Android, while prior versions of the Kindle were Java-based," Oracle added. "Android has been gaining in other areas as well, with Android-based set-top boxes and even televisions appearing this year. These are markets where Java has traditionally been strong but is now losing ground to Android."

While Google has argued that the number of Java developers actually grew since Oracle filed suit, many of them are focusing on Android and "not for licensed Java implementations," Oracle said.

For its part, Google has "no interest in delaying resolution of this case any longer than necessary," but a January start is not workable given various scheduling issues, the company said in the joint statement. In fact, it may be "difficult to conduct trial before July 2012," Google said.

Oracle's own public figures show that there are 2.5 million more Java developers since the lawsuit was filed, Google added. On one hand, "Oracle contends that many of these developers are writing for Android, with no benefit to Oracle," Google added. "But this is inconsistent with the fact that Oracle touts these figures."

Oracle sued Google in August 2010, alleging that Android violated a number of patents and copyrights it holds on Java, which Oracle gained control of through the acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Google has admitted no wrongdoing.

The court has proposed splitting the trial into a number of phases. While Google is in support of such a move, Oracle has opposed doing so on grounds it would result in redundant testimony.

It's possible that some resolution on the trial's start date and format could come on Wednesday, when the joint filing is discussed at a scheduled pretrial conference.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Amazon, Google, IDG, Oracle, Sun Microsystems
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Android OS, application development, Civil lawsuits, Google, intellectual property, Languages and standards, legal, open source, oracle, patent, software
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Case Study: HJ Heinz
    Heinz has trusted Sophos to protect its desktop users and email systems from malware and spam for many years. As part of its multi-tier approach to IT security, the company needed more robust protection against web-based threats and the use of unauthorised applications.
    Learn more »
  • Why Hackers have Turned to Malicious JavaScript Attacks
    Website attacks have become a serious business proposition. In the past, hackers may have infected websites to gain notoriety or just to prove they could—but today, it’s all about the money. Reaching unsuspecting users through the web is easy and effective. Hackers now use sophisticated techniques—like injecting inline JavaScript—to spread malware through the web. Learn about the threat of malicious JavaScript attacks, and how they work. Understand how cybercriminals make money with these types of attacks and why IT managers should be vigilant.
    Learn more »
  • Developing an Information Strategy - Strategize, Align, Govern, Execute, and Optimize
    An information strategy defines how a company will use the data it collects to achieve a competitive advantage. It is a comprehensive, constantly evolving plan that encompasses five distinct actions. In this white paper we explore how these five vital actions, as well as the technologies that enable and support them, can help organizations develop an effective and broad-reaching information strategy that drives positive change.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.