Carrier IQ drops legal threat against security researcher
- 29 November, 2011 07:12
- Comments
Software vendor Carrier IQ has withdrawn its threat to sue a security researcher for saying that its software helps phone companies surreptitiously track users of many popular mobile phones.
Company CEO Larry Lenhart, also apologized to researcher Trevor Eckhart for making the threat and expressed his interest in having an "open dialogue" going forward.
Eckhart earlier this month published a document explaining how Carrier IQ's software, which runs by default on several mobile devices, could be used to log detailed information about the phone user's activities.
In his analysis, Eckhart likened Carrier IQ's software to a rootkit that could be used to collect virtually any kind of data from a mobile phone without the user's permission or knowledge.
A lot of the information collected by the software is designed to enable mobile operators and device vendors to quickly identify and address quality and service-related issues. But the software can be tweaked to gather much more intrusive data about a user's location, the software and applications on the device, which keys being pressed and what applications are in use, Eckhart said in his analysis.
In many cases, the software is hidden from users, collects information without their knowledge and is relatively hard for non-technical users to detect and to remove, Eckhart maintained.
In doing his analysis, Eckhart referenced publicly available training materials that he had accessed from Carrier IQ's site. He mirrored those training documents on two separate sites in order to let other security researchers verify his findings in case Carrier IQ removed the materials from its site.
In response, Carrier IQ sent a cease-and-desist letter to Eckhart accusing him of copyright infringement for making copies of the company's training material. The company demanded that Eckhart remove his analysis from the Web and replace it instead with an apology crafted by the company.
The letter also directed Eckhart to contact all those whom he had directly or indirectly provided copies of the training materials and to inform them that the material was copyright protected. The cease-and-desist letter asked Eckhart to provide Carrier IQ with the names and contact information of everybody might have gotten copies of the training documents.
Carrier IQ also wanted Eckhart to issue a press release via the Associated Press, expressing his regret and his apology for publishing the analysis and calling its software a rootkit.
Eckhart contacted the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which promptly agreed to defend the researcher against Carrier IQ's threat.
EFF sent a note ( download PDF ) to Carrier IQ, challenging the company's claims and asking it to withdraw its threat against Eckhart immediately.
In its letter, the EFF said Carrier IQ's claims were baseless and noted that Eckhart's work and his use of Carrier IQ's training materials were protected under the First Amendment and by the fair use doctrine.
"Given that there is no basis for your legal claims, we must conclude that your threats are motivated by a desire to suppress Mr. Eckhart's research conclusions, and to prevent others from verifying those conclusions," the EFF said in its letter.
Lenhart's apology to Eckhart and its decision to withdraw its threat against him were contained in a letter ( download PDF ) to the EFF last week. "We are deeply sorry for any concern or trouble that our letter may have caused Mr. Eckhart," Lenhart wrote. "In retrospect, we realize that we would have been better served by reaching out to Mr. Eckhart to establish a dialogue in the first instance."
Jaikumar Vijayan covers data security and privacy issues, financial services security and e-voting for Computerworld. Follow Jaikumar on Twitter at @jaivijayan or subscribe to Jaikumar's RSS feed . His e-mail address is jvijayan@computerworld.com .
Read more about drm and legal issues in Computerworld's DRM and Legal Issues Topic Center.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- The mobile print enterprise - How IT consumerisaton is driving anytime, anywhere printing
- Businesses are ready for a new approach to IT - Simplify deployment and reduce complexity using systems integrated with expertise
- Shedding Light on Backup and Availability Challenges in Virtual Environments
- Transforming Software Delivery: An IBM Rational Case Study
- Collaborative software delivery: Managing today’s complex environment to improve software quality
-
How to implement next-generation storage infrastructure for Big Data
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
Apple aims iPads at High Schools
-
Virtual Certainty - Best Practices for Gaining Monitoring Clarity in VMware Environments
The benefits of virtualisation are unassailable: increased agility, scale, and cost savings to name but a few. However, so too are the monitoring challenges posed by these environments—including complexity, lack of visibility and control, and inefficiency. This white paper reveals the best monitoring practices to employ in virtualized environments—best practices that are essential in enabling organizations to overcome their monitoring challenges so they can get the most business value from their virtualisation investments. -
Managing IBM License Complexity
IBM provides thousands of products in its portfolio and uses a variety of license models, contract terms and conditions. These license models can be very complex, causing frequent confusion for organisations trying to grasp the concepts while maintaining license compliance. While at first IBM licensing may seem incomprehensible, some education on the license models and licensing scenarios will help minimise the confusion. In addition, a more automated approach to managing licenses enables organisations to gain control, reduce ongoing software costs and minimise license liability risks. Read on. -
Oracle SOA Suite – Oracle BPEL Process Manager
Changing markets, increasing competitive pressures and evolving customer needs are placing greater pressure on IT to deliver greater flexibility and speed. In response to these challenges, leading companies are adopting Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) as a means of delivering on these requirements by overcoming the complexity of their application and IT environments. Read on.
-
OLAP Solutions, Second Edition
-
Hdtv for Dummies, 2nd Edition
-
Developing eBay Business Tools for Dummies
-
Facebook Application Development
-
Mac OS X Snow Leopard All-In-One for Dummies®
-
Mastering Windows Server 2008 Small Business Server
-
Creating the Virtual Classroom
-
Building the Knowledge Management Network
-
Crystal Reports 2008 for Dummies








Comments
Post new comment