Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Don't blame Anonymous for Facebook porn storm, says researcher

Facebook admits its 'self-XSS' defenses failed

The recent spam attack that planted pornographic images on Facebook was not the work of Anonymous, a security researcher said today.

On Tuesday, Facebook confirmed what it called "a coordinated spam attack" that resulted in sexually explicit images, as well as photos of extreme violence and animal abuse, spreading on member's pages.

Earlier that day, some had speculated that Anonymous -- the hacker collective best known for conducting distributed-denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against Visa, MasterCard and other firms that had stripped WikiLeaks of payment processing rights -- was behind the Facebook attack.

According to Romanian security vendor BitDefender, Anonymous crafted a classic Facebook worm, codenamed "Fawkes Virus," last July, and had pledged to use it to celebrate Guy Fawkes Day, Nov. 5 -- a promise the gang later withdrew .

Guy Fawkes was arrested Nov. 5, 1605, for his part in the Gunpowder Plot to assassinate King James I of England. Anonymous has often used a mask of Fawkes as a logo for its hacking campaigns.

BitDefender's find of Fawkes -- which it announced Nov. 12, just days before the Facebook porn storm -- prompted some, including Computerworld to speculate that Anonymous' malware was the cause of the fast-spreading offensive images.

Not the case, said BitDefender.

"It looks like other Facebook attacks," said George Petre, a senior social media security researcher at BitDefender, in an email reply to questions, referring to the porn attacks against the social networking giant.

"These are ordinary scams and we believe Anonymous would use something more sophisticated," Petre continued. "We expect the Fawkes virus to be something related to malware, and to have complex mechanisms."

Facebook has said that the attacks were conducted by exploiting what it called a "self-XSS browser vulnerability."

That label -- self-XSS -- has been used by other researchers to describe a ploy where spam messages tell recipients to copy and paste JavaScript into their browser's address bar. The script, however, is in fact malicious and exploits a bug to hijack the account, post images on their news feeds, and spread the images to others.

The same tactic has been used against Facebook members before, notably last May when a campaign baited the trap with a promise of video showing the death of Al-Qaeda terrorist Osama Bin Laden at the hands of U.S. special forces.

Just days after the Bin Laden attacks, Facebook touted security improvements, including one designed to stymie some self-XSS attacks.

"Now, when our systems detect that someone has pasted malicious code into the address bar, we will show a challenge to confirm that the person meant to do this as well as provide information on why it's a bad idea," said Facebook. "[And] we are also working with the major browser companies to fix the underlying issue that allows spammers to do this."

Yesterday, Facebook admitted that the pornographic self-XSS attacks had sidestepped those defenses.

"We had since adapted our systems to the Bin Laden self-XSS variant [but] this attack used a previously-unknown spam vector," said a Facebook spokesman in an email Wednesday. "We have now tweaked our systems to better detect and block this variant."

Facebook also said that it had identified those responsible for the attacks, and was "working with our legal team to ensure appropriate consequences follow."

As BitDefender threw cold water on the idea that Anonymous plotted the attacks, other researchers said they were still in the dark about how the hackers duped users or who had created the spam.

"We still do not have solid information or screenshots," acknowledged Commtouch, whose researchers have previously discussed self-XSS attacks . "The spread of the images makes it difficult to determine the originating users who actually, or unknowingly, started the attack."

Users can prevent self-XSS attacks by refusing to copy and paste JavaScript -- or anything else -- into their browsers' address bars, experts have advised.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer , on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His e-mail address is gkeizer@computerworld.com .

See more articles by Gregg Keizer .

Read more about security in Computerworld's Security Topic Center.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Apple, BitDefender, Commtouch, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Topic, Visa
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: anonymous, bitdefender, Cybercrime and Hacking, Facebook, Malware and Vulnerabilities, security, visa, Web 2.0 and Web Apps, wikileaks
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Award-winning unified information security from Clearswift.
    Fully integrated web and email gateway security solution, providing - protection from inbound threats, policy based encryption, and data loss prevention.
    Learn more »
  • Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management Vendor: An Ovum Report
    Leading industry analyst firms across the world include IBM Rational in their research efforts and provide opinions on our ALM solutions. Find out how Ovum confirmed IBM Rational as the clear leader on both axes of the assessment; Market Impact and Technology, along with a clear leadership in market presence.
    Learn more »
  • Unified Monitoring™ A Business Perspective
    The enterprise computing landscape has changed dramatically. Virtualisation, outsourcing, SaaS, and cloud computing are creating fundamental changes, and ushering in an era in which enterprises distribute increasingly critical IT assets and applications across multiple service providers.This paper explores today’s computing trends and their monitoring implications in detail. In addition, it reveals how a new monitoring paradigm architecture, that uniquely addresses the monitoring realities of today’s and tomorrow’s enterprises—whether they rely on internal platforms, external service providers, or a combination of both.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments