Open source vs. proprietary software
- 04 November, 2011 07:32
- Comments 1
The "scrufffy guy coding away in his basement" archetype stopped applying to open-source software a while ago.
It just doesn't make sense when you consider that heavyweight vendors like IBM and Microsoft - which built empires based on proprietary software - constitute some of biggest contributors in money and development resources to widely used open-source projects like the Linux OS.
In turn, Red Hat has built a nearly billion-dollar business based on open source.
NETWORK WORLD'S HOTTEST TECH ARGUMENTS: Read the rest
So where's the controversy? The situation may not be that as much as it is a quest for bragging rights.
"A lot of software innovation today is being driven by organizations that aren't in the business of selling software, which means that a great deal of it is open source," says Redmonk analyst Stephen O'Grady. "Proprietary software's role as the primary innovator in the market is, effectively, over."
That's not to say that every new idea in software is germinating in the open-source world, but proprietary software is certainly being shunted aside in that regard, O'Grady adds.
The open-source inventions of today are aimed at solving specific problems businesses are encountering, particularly those born on the web, according to O'Grady.
Take Yahoo. When the search company ran into problems processing ever-larger reams of information, it came up with the Hadoop open-source data processing framework.
"Consider, for example, whether Oracle ever would have been incented to invent something like Hadoop," he says. "The answer is probably no, because from a sales perspective, its potential impact would be negative. Yahoo, on the other hand, simply had a business problem to solve."
And now, proprietary vendors are ever more eager to hitch their wagons to open-source projects. Hadoop in particular is caught up in a virtual arms race, as companies, including Oracle roll out premium products and services that leverage the technology. Things are heating up in similar fashion for R, an open-source technology for statistical analysis long used by academics.
This trend in turn has led to a new debate, says 451 Group analyst Jay Lyman.
"Today's open source vs. proprietary software debates typically center not on which model is better, as I think there is some general agreement that both have their place," he says. "Instead, today's discussion centers on what is open source or not."
Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud and other public cloud services are largely built with open-source components like MySQL, JBoss, Tomcat, Xen and Linux. "But are they open source? Most people would rightly say they are not," Lyman says. "Nevertheless, all of the underlying pieces are open source."
"It used to be pretty clearly defined whether a vendor or product was open source, but as we've seen the largest vendors in the industry -- all of them -- embrace and integrate with open source software, those lines of definition have bled together," he adds.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
Apple aims iPads at High Schools
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Google Jumps Into Social Bookmarks Game
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
INFORMATION FOR SUCCESS - Customers Achieve Extreme Performance at Lowest Cost with Oracle Exadata Database Machine
How do you prioritize IT investments to ensure support for growing volumes of data and still meet your business users’ evolving requirements—such as competing more effectively, reducing IT costs, meeting compliance requirements, or anticipating changing market conditions? Read on. -
Consolidated Storage for Virtualised Server Environments
This research brief is based on a recent Tech Target survey with more than 200 storage administrators and IT professionals in mid-sized and enterprise-class companies, and focuses on how these decision-makers view the storage-related challenges that result from server virtualisation. See the results. -
Maximise Software Cost Savings by License Reharvesting, Recycling & Applying Product Use Rights
Software asset management (SAM) is a complex process that enables organisations to gain control of their software estate from both a license compliance and financial standpoint. In many organisations, SAM represents one of the few remaining ways that substantial IT savings can be realised. McKinsey and Sand-Hill Group estimate that 30% or more of IT budgets are consumed by software license and maintenance costs. By optimising the SAM process, organisations can maximise software utilisation, reduce the risk of non-compliance (audits, fees, penalties), and reduce overall IT costs by as much as 5 to 10% per year. Read on.
-
Enterprise JMS Programming
-
Windows 98 Secrets Bonus Pack (3 CD-ROMs)
-
Ant Colony Optimization and Constraint Programming
-
Digital Photography Before & After Makeovers
-
Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 24Seven
-
C++ Courseware Student Version Adapted From Horstmann C++ Essentials
-
Visual Basic 2005 Instant Results
-
Blogging All-In-One for Dummies
-
Red Hat Linux Fedora for Dummies








Comments
arenasolutions
The interesting thing here too, is that this doesn't have to be limited to software, i think this model could work for hardware (although a lot of things would have to change.)
I am actually really interested personally in the open-source model, and some of the places it has worked. (And the potential for new business models to evolve out of it.) I interviewed my CTO recently about some areas where it could work for hardware, curious what your audience thinks - http://blog.arenasolutions.com/open-design-hardware-manufacturing/ - and do you think adopting open-source philosophy will eventually usher in open-source companies and design?
Post new comment