The UN, copyright extremism and you
- 02 November, 2011 13:32
In September representatives from India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) got together to talk about the Internet. Their conclusion: The 'Net needed help from the United Nations in the areas of developing policies, technical standards, operation, dispute resolution and crises management.
The improbable conclusion that the U.N. could actually provide any help in any of these areas has been discussed in various Internet-savvy forums and roundly dismissed as a very bad idea. But that did not stop India from formally proposing it to the U.N. on Oct. 26. Meanwhile, the U.S. House of Representatives is trying its best to come up with an even worse idea for Internet governance.
Fundamentally, the IBSA proposal is to take Internet management away from the motley collection of organizations and companies that have made a roaring success of the Internet, which is now used by billions of people and serves as the mechanism supporting trillions of dollars of commerce, and turn it over to the diplomatic core, a group not noted for its ability to do anything other than talk and obstruct. Or, to put it another way, the IBSA proposal is based on the premise that the Internet is too important to leave to those people who know what they are doing. This would be a good way to ensure that the Internet of the future would not resemble the dynamic and innovative Internet we know today.
Currently the Internet is basically unregulated, from the point of view of traditional telecom regulators. Technical standards for Internet protocols and applications largely come from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and many private companies. The Internet runs over new as well as traditional telecommunications standards from organizations such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the U.N.-based International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
But there are no meaningful international Internet-specific regulations or policies. The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) serve as voluntary multi-stakeholder forums for discussion and coordination of Internet policies and operation, but have little decisional power (on purpose). Both organizations held meetings last month in Africa.
(See opening remarks from Larry Strickling of the U.S. Department of Commerce for a good description of the multi-stakeholder concept and Kieren McCarthy's review of the IBSA proposal for more detail on the IBSA proposal and its impact.)
Back in the United States, a similar proposal to destroy the future usability of the Internet has been proposed by some members of the House. The proposal, with the neat handle of the "E-PARASITE bill," seems to be a conscious effort to take the already awful PROTECT-IP bill and make it worse.
This bill removes any remaining pretense that its House supporters consider the interests of the people that voted for them at all relevant to their existence. It also removes any pretense of due process from the consideration of copyright on the Internet. I will not say that it is copyright extremism at its worst, because I expect they will endeavor to make it worse as it proceeds. As you might expect, the Internet technical community thinks these proposals are a very bad idea technically, but the bill's supporters dismiss information from people who know what they are doing. Copyright is important, but the U.S. Constitution balances copyright interests with those of society -- these bills do not -- the only parasites here are the copyright holders.
Why does this matter to you? The E-PARASITE bill provides your competitor or disgruntled customer endless ways to make your life miserable and even cause your website to disappear altogether without you even being asked for your side of the story. (See http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111027/00083116531/e-parasites-bill-end-internet-as-we-know-it.shtml for details.)
Extremism seems to be a common approach to the world these days and the Internet is just the latest target, both domestically and internationally.
Disclaimer: Harvard will find out my opinion when it reads it in Network World, and the university played no role in developing this semi-extreme view.
Read more about data center in Network World's Data Center section.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Their conclusion
- New bill would target websites enabling copyright infringement
- Applications Research Center - Network World
- Internet Engineering Task Force
- World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
- IEEE - The world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology
- International Telecommunication Union
- The Internet Governance Forum
- ICANN : Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
- Opening Session
- India formally proposes government takeover of Internet : News and analysis from .nxt
- Read The Bill: H.R. 3261 - GovTrack.us
- thinks these proposals are a very bad idea technically
- E-PARASITE Bill: 'The End Of The Internet As We Know It' : Techdirt
- Data Center Research Center - Network World
Ruggedized scientific calculator perfect for extreme math
How to Switch From iPhone 5S to BlackBerry Z30 (and Why)
How to Switch From iPhone 5S to BlackBerry Z30 (and Why)
CIOs to Become In-House Brokers -- and That's a Good Thing
The future of computing
Avoiding Common Pitfalls of Evaluating and Implementing DCIM Solutions
While many who invest in Data Centre Infrastructure Management (DCIM) software benefit greatly, some do not. Research has revealed a number of pitfalls that end users should avoid when evaluating and implementing DCIM solutions. Choosing an inappropriate solution, relying on inadequate processes, and a lack of commitment / ownership / knowledge can each undermine a chosen toolset’s ability to deliver the value it was designed to provide. This paper describes these common pitfalls and provides practical guidance on how to avoid them.
Transform IT, Transform the Enterprise
Existing IT operational models and an ageing infrastructure are CIOs back from their full potential. This paper reveals the three IT imperatives for a CIO-led transformation, and details how CIOs are adopting strategies to change IT and assert their organisations as business leaders and innovators.
CISO 2013 Security Insights: A new standard for security leaders
Insights from the 2013 IBM Chief Information Security Officer Assessment which uncovered a set of leading business, technology and measurement practices that help to address the questions CISO's and security leaders have in managing diverse business concerns, creating mobile security policies and in fully integrating business, risk and security metrics.