Apple suppliers accused of environmental damage
- 31 August, 2011 20:55
- Comments
Environmental groups in China criticized Apple on Wednesday, alleging that it is employing suppliers that are damaging the environment and threatening the lives of residents. Apple, however, maintains the company has been vigilant in ensuring all its suppliers follow environmental safety requirements.
The watchdog groups, which include the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, released a report after conducting a five-month investigation on electronic suppliers that they believe are used by Apple.
In the Chinese city of Kunshan, accessory manufacturer Kaedar Electronics and printed circuit board maker Unimicron have allegedly been discharging waste water and harmful gas from their plants, causing nearby residents to worry about their health, according to the report.
In April, the environmental groups spoke with the residents. "Over the ten-year period, many people have fallen sick, with a sharp increase in the village's cancer rates," the report claims. Since 2007, more than nine people have suffered or died from cancer in the village, which has a population of less than 60.
Meiko Electronics, a Japanese company that builds printed circuit boards, was also found to have polluted a lake in the Chinese city of Wuhan with copper and nickel, according to tests carried out by the environmental groups in April. The lake directly feeds into the Yangtze River, which is China's longest river.
Apple declined to say if the companies named were in fact its suppliers. But in a statement, the company reiterated its commitment to achieving safe environmental standards.
Apple does this by regularly conducting audits and working with suppliers to correct violations, according to the company's 2011 supplier responsibility progress report. In 2010, the company audited 127 facilities and found that 89 percent of them had waste water management practices in compliance with Apple's requirements.
The same audits, however, found that only 69 percent of the facilities were in compliance with air emission management standards. Only 70 percent of the facilities were in compliance for environmental permits and reporting. When violations are found, Apple requires the supplier to complete plans to resolve the problem 90 days after the audit.
Kaedar Electronics, Unimicron and Meiko could not be reached for immediate comment.
The environmental groups have criticized Apple before. In January, the groups released a report providing cases of where Apple suppliers violated environmental regulations in China. The report also pointed to an incident involving workers poisoned by poor working conditions at a supplier's factory.
Following the report, Apple restated its pledge to provide safe working conditions among its suppliers.
The environmental groups' newest report also investigated Foxconn Technology, which builds iPhones and iPads. One of the company's industrial parks in the Chinese city of Taiyuan emits air pollution that contains irritants, causing residents to complain. Following local government action, Foxconn halted part of their production line at the industrial park, according to the report.
Foxconn said in a statement the company is committed to abiding by the laws to ensure the environment's protection. "We work closely with local government and environmental protection officials to monitor the performance of each and every one of our facilities," the company said.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
Google Jumps Into Social Bookmarks Game
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Monday Grok: Will Siri crack the walls of GOOG?
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
10 Essential Steps to Email Security
Modern business is reliant on email. All organisations using email need to answer the following questions: How do we control spam volumes without the risk of trapping a business email? How do we prevent infections from email-borne viruses? How do we stop leakage of confidential information? Can we detect and stop exploitation from phishing attacks? How do we control brand damage from occurring due to employee misuse? How do we prevent inappropriate content from being circulated? -
Why Hackers have Turned to Malicious JavaScript Attacks
Website attacks have become a serious business proposition. In the past, hackers may have infected websites to gain notoriety or just to prove they could—but today, it’s all about the money. Reaching unsuspecting users through the web is easy and effective. Hackers now use sophisticated techniques—like injecting inline JavaScript—to spread malware through the web. Learn about the threat of malicious JavaScript attacks, and how they work. Understand how cybercriminals make money with these types of attacks and why IT managers should be vigilant. -
The Top 5 Server Monitoring Battles—and How You Can Win Them
The role of servers in your organization has changed substantially—with their uses, requirements, and complexity all increasing dramatically in recent years. Many of the traditional tools and techniques that worked in the past don’t suffice any more. Consequently, server monitoring presents several critical battles in today’s demanding environments. This guide looks at some of the most pressing challenges administrators face in ensuring optimal server performance, and it offers insights into the tools and strategies required to address these demands.
-
Office 2007 for Dummies
-
Excel 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Seniors for Dummies®
-
Teach Yourself Visually Windows 7
-
MYOB Software for Dummies 6E Australian Edition
-
Office 2007 All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Windows 7 for Dummies® Dvd+book Bundle
-
Windows 7 for Dummies®
-
Computers for Seniors for Dummies, 2nd Edition








Comments
Post new comment