Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Vendors patch firewalls after controversial NSS Labs test

NSS Labs has now accepted the vendors' patches for the flaws they initially denied existed

Four out of the five vendors shown last month by testing company NSS Labs to suffer a security flaw in their high-end firewalls have since patched their products, including two companies that disputed the issue at the time.

A statement released by NSS Labs confirmed that Fortinet, SonicWALL and Palo Alto Networks had now updated their products to fix the TCP split handshake issue revealed on April 12, while Juniper Networks had addressed it by altering the product's default setting.

One company, Cisco, has yet to issue a patch but recommended a workaround using access control lists that avoided the issue in some but not all cases.

In the days after publication, the NSS Labs tests proved controversial, with one company, Fortinet, disputing the significance of the flaw with the claim that the issue could be prevented by turning on the company's separate intrusion prevention system (IPS) and antivirus security modules.

"NSS Labs incorrectly states that Fortinet does not currently provide customers with protection against a TCP split handshake," said Fortinet's VP of product marketing, Patrick Bedwell, at the time.

"We feel strongly that integrated protection is the best approach for blocking this issue, as customers that have IPS working with their firewall are better protected against a wider range of threats," said Bedwell.

The tests also upset SonicWALL. "This claim [the TCP split handshake attack vulnerability] is not correct since SonicOS has had the referenced TCP Split Handshake Spoof protection since SonicOS 3.0 released in 2004. Regrettably, NSS chose not to enable it for their testing despite our insistence on it being enabled for proper results," said company PR Director Jock Breitwieser.

Although neither company denied the likelihood of a patch being necessary, that they have been issued rapidly suggests a calmer assessment of the NSS tests now that the heat of the moment has passed.

"Only this kind of rigorous, unsponsored testing could have uncovered these types of critical issues. Product quality is a big issue in the security industry," said NSS Labs head Rick Moy. "That most vendors are ultimately fixing the problem validates our work, despite a vendor's initial marketing response."

The affair could yet turn out to be a significant moment for the security appliance industry. There has been criticism in the past that vendors have over-relied on product testing that was not independent enough to reveal important security issues to the businesses that buy the products. The NSS Labs firewall tests were sponsored by unnamed financial services companies and not vendors.

The five firewalls affected by the TCP split handshake flaw were the Fortinet Fortigate 3950 series, SonicWall NSA E8500, Palo Alto Networks PA-4020, Juniper SRX5800 and Cisco ASA 5585-40. Only one product looked at, Check Point's Power-1 11065, did not suffer from the flaw. Patching advice can be found through each vendor's Web support system, although NSS Labs has advised companies to test the patches carefully first.

"Enabling this protection may have a negative impact on performance and/or break applications that are not using TCP properly," said NSS Labs in its statement.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: ASA, Check Point, Cisco, Enabling, Fortinet, IPS, Juniper, Juniper Networks, NSA, Palo Alto Networks, SonicWall, SonicWALL
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: firewalls, NSS Labs, security
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Business Process Management, Service-Oriented Architecture, and Web 2.0: Business Transformation or Train Wreck?
    As a result of more and more organisations adopting new technologies and business practices surrounding BPM, SOA, and Web 2.0, fundamental changes have arisen in the way IT and business stakeholders work together. Make this into an opportunity - read on.
    Learn more »
  • Maximise Software Cost Savings by License Reharvesting, Recycling & Applying Product Use Rights
    Software asset management (SAM) is a complex process that enables organisations to gain control of their software estate from both a license compliance and financial standpoint. In many organisations, SAM represents one of the few remaining ways that substantial IT savings can be realised. McKinsey and Sand-Hill Group estimate that 30% or more of IT budgets are consumed by software license and maintenance costs. By optimising the SAM process, organisations can maximise software utilisation, reduce the risk of non-compliance (audits, fees, penalties), and reduce overall IT costs by as much as 5 to 10% per year. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • How to Choose an SMB - Unified Communications as a Service (UCAAS) Solution
    The on-premise deployment of Unified Communications (UC) continues to be a source of considerable corporate angst especially for the Small to Medium Business (SMB) sector. IT research firm Gartner believes UCaaS will be adopted as an adjunct service by large enterprises and as a core service by SMBs before 2015. To help SMBs choose the best offering and develop a suitable roadmap Computerworld has prepared this special feature profiling the major offerings in the Australian market.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments