Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Financial firm fined $25M for hiding software glitch that cost investors $217M

An investment fund that hid flaws in a computer application that set the fund's strategy for making trades has agreed to pay a $25 million SEC fine and pay back $217 million in losses suffered by investors because of the problem.

AXA Rosenburg Group caught a coding error last April, but the employees who found it tried to keep others from finding out and failed to report it to higher-ups, the company says, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.

When investors complained that their portfolios were performing badly, the company told them market volatility among other things -- but not including the software flaw -- were to blame, the Securities and Exchange Commission says, according to the Wall Street Journal. The company had been charged with fraud.

AXA is a quantitative investment fund, which is a category of fund that uses computer models to decide trading strategies, and the SEC looking harder at them and their algorithms because of the potential to increase risk to investors and also to disrupt markets, the report says.

Of concern is whether these funds tell investors enough about the risks involved in the way they determine what to invest in and whether these quantitative funds act together to manipulate prices, the report says.

Read more about software in Network World's Software section.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: AXA, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Wall Street
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: software
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Guidance for Calculation of Efficiency (PUE) in Data Centers
    The benefits of determining data center infrastructure efficiency as part of an effective energy management plan are widely recognised. The standard metrics of Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) and its reciprocal Data Center Infrastructure Efficiency1 (DCIE) have emerged as recognised standards. This paper defines a standard approach to collecting data from data centers and showing how to use it to calculate PUE, with a focus on what to do with data that is confusing or incomplete.
    Learn more »
  • Oracle SOA vs. IBM SOA - Customer Perspectives on Evaluating Complexity and Business Value
    The Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) model has become the cornerstone of business computing. Its ability to greatly accelerate the development of business-critical applications promotes business agility, decreases time-to-value and total cost of ownership (TCO), and greatly increases the efficiency and strategic value of IT. SOA implementations tend to be complex, IT decision makers should carefully consider their choice of a SOA platform in terms of its ability to simplify the fundamental development, deployment, and management tasks involved. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • Risk management: ensuring the security of your hosted information
    Organisations of all sizes are becoming victims to cybercriminals, data breaches, information theft and security risks. But before you go out and spend a fortune on security software, solutions and consultants, the starting point is to identify and measure your business’s exposure to those risks. In this whitepaper, “Exploring, Identifying and Measuring” risk, we examine how to identify risk and share an approach for identifying and measuring risk in your organisation.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments