Proving the value of IT - Part two
- 02 February, 2011 10:03
- Comments 2
Start with the business case
To some extent, organisations are being held back from realising the value of IT projects by the very way in which they measure success. Too often, it is based solely on the business case.
“The business case sows the seeds for success or failure of IT-enabled investments,” says Peter Harrison, who leads the value management competency within IBM. Harrison thinks organisations need a better vision for the much-maligned business case.
“There is a huge dissatisfaction with the business case approach, philosophy and practice,” he says. “It’s all about promising things that are rarely delivered. And that is why there is a lot of scepticism. Very few people believe business cases and it all comes back to a fundamental point: A lot of organisations don’t spend enough time in the rigour up front.”
Harrison cites one CIO who laconically observed that were his organisation to have banked all the business case benefits for lead time reduction, the company would be delivering goods to customers before the product was made. Rather than promising things that are rarely delivered, clued-up CIOs are spending the time to build a rigorous case based on business strategy. It’s a high level conversation not traditionally associated with IT value.
Read Part one of CIO Australia's IT value series.
“When we talk about the value of IT, we are often really talking about reducing the total cost of ownership and how we run the IT quotient — which is a lower level conversation,” Harrison says. “The conversation shouldn’t be about ‘IT and the business’; it should be ‘IT and the other parts of the business’.”
It may seem like a subtle distinction, but it’s an important one, and it’s something that has always puzzled Grant Swinbourne, former general manager for business systems with the Jetset Travelworld Group.
“If IT and the business are not aligned from the start, somebody must be doing something wrong,” he says. “Nobody talks about finance-business alignment or marketing-business alignment, so why do organisations persist in talking about the IT-business alignment as if they’re separate entities with little relationship to each other?”
Swinbourne was instrumental in developing the systems for the budget airline, Jetstar, when it launched in Australia and says the experience showed him the value of having IT as an integral part of the commercial team. Working literally alongside other parts of the business, the team was able to develop innovative products that have become part and parcel of today’s airline experience, such as seat selection.
“We turned on membership functionality on day one,” he recalls. In its early stages, the functionality allowed customers to simply enter their details and sign up for marketing information.
Jetstar gained about 100,000 members in its first month. Within 12 months, that figure had skyrocketed to 750,000 and, today, the airline boasts more than 2.5 million members.
Capability Management partner, Jed Simms, who along with colleague Vince Gill co-authored the Shifting focus, shifting results paper, says the issue is that the business case is seen by most organisations as a financial document that therefore comes under the auspices of finance.
“It’s not — it’s a strategic document” he says. “It’s about how you are implementing strategy and the returns you will receive for the funds invested.
“It’s also often just a collection of fields; it doesn’t actually tell a story or capture the value proposition you are trying to put up. [People] think it’s just a grab for cash when, in fact, it is very much the focal point of the project.”
Rather than thinking in terms of cost first, benefits later, executives — not just CIOs — should be inverting their thinking.
“By swapping those two concepts around, you suddenly get value,” Simms says. “Because our research has found that, in the whole end-to-end process, the business case was the greatest destroyer of value.”
In fact 46 per cent of CIOs surveyed considered their current business case to be a destroyer of value.
Download the joint research by Capability Management and the CIO Executive Council.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Monday Grok: Will Siri crack the walls of GOOG?
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
How to Choose an SMB - Unified Communications as a Service (UCAAS) Solution
The on-premise deployment of Unified Communications (UC) continues to be a source of considerable corporate angst especially for the Small to Medium Business (SMB) sector. IT research firm Gartner believes UCaaS will be adopted as an adjunct service by large enterprises and as a core service by SMBs before 2015. To help SMBs choose the best offering and develop a suitable roadmap Computerworld has prepared this special feature profiling the major offerings in the Australian market. -
Essar Group - Essar Group executives enjoy printing on the move
Essar Group’s senior management are constantly on the road. So it’s not surprising that the company has become a heavy user of mobile computing solutions to enable them to get their job done. The mobility and productivity of executives; enable them to easily print documents from any company location to any company printer using their smartphone. Read more. -
Unified Monitoring™ A Business Perspective
The enterprise computing landscape has changed dramatically. Virtualisation, outsourcing, SaaS, and cloud computing are creating fundamental changes, and ushering in an era in which enterprises distribute increasingly critical IT assets and applications across multiple service providers.This paper explores today’s computing trends and their monitoring implications in detail. In addition, it reveals how a new monitoring paradigm architecture, that uniquely addresses the monitoring realities of today’s and tomorrow’s enterprises—whether they rely on internal platforms, external service providers, or a combination of both.
















Comments
John Thorp
Not surprisingly, as I have known and worked with Peter Harrison for many years, and am currently in an electronic dialogue with Jed Simms, I absolutely agree with the points in this article. The business case process is non-existent, broken or fundamentally flawed in most organisations today, certainly when it comes to investments involving IT, but also more broadly. Business cases are seen as a bureaucratic hurdle to be got through, by whatever means, in oder to "get the money and run", rather than the incredibly powerful management tool that they can and should be. You can find more about my views on this at http://tinyurl.com/4mo25sj
craig wilkins
Hear hear, it is great to hear someone who talks my mind. It is not necessarily the business case that is flawed, what is missing is the quantification of the value of the potential benefits. This MUST be a key inclusion in the business case.
Only then can a business benefits plan be put in place which is required to enable the harvesting of the benefits after the fact.
I am an active advocate for changing the mindset of accountable parties to bring this component into play.
Post new comment