Open source powers new Aussie space race
- 27 January, 2011 16:07
- Comments
A group of Australian Linux enthusiasts are using freely available software and hardware designs to engineer a space craft that could one day land on the moon and reap millions of dollars in prize money from Google.
The Lunar Numbat project was started by a team of Australians and New Zealanders who have partnered with the Google Lunar X-Prize team White Label Space.
The ultimate aim is to put "a Linux-powered robotic Australian marsupial" on the Moon.
The Google Lunar X-Prize is offering $US30 million to the first privately funded rover to land safely on the Moon, rove 500 meters and send high definition pictures and video back to Earth.
Melbourne-based physicist Luke Weston is leading the hardware development for Lunar Numbat's rocket engine throttle controller.
Speaking at this year’s Linux.conf.au open source software conference in Brisbane, Weston said the team is working with the Australian Space Research Institute (ASRI) to provide low cost open source technologies for local space projects.
“Australia was the third nation to launch a satellite from its own territory and we had an active space program back in the sixties,” Weston said. “It was launched on a British made vehicle. ASRI is interested in changing this.”
The Australia defence force has donated a stockpile of rockets like the Zuni missile to ASRI for experiments.
“We are designing and implementing electronic controllers for the rockets using open software and open hardware,” Weston said.
Back in 2004 researchers at the University of NSW also worked on putting Linux in space for one of its satellite projects.
The software is generally licenced under the GPL and the hardware under the TAPR Open Hardware licences.
“White Label Space is one of the teams in the Google Lunar X prize and it is the only team with any Australian involvement,” he said, adding people from around the world are also involved.
“There is a lot of space expertise in this group,” he said. “We’re focused on AUSROC 2.5 and the central main flight computer will be an embedded Linux machine.”
The team is also working on video compression and MJPEG2000 will be used for HD multimedia transmission over “quite a bandwidth limited” connection.
“This will require a fairly powerful Linux computer on the space craft,” Weston said. “Maybe Blackfin, but Moon hardware will have to be thermally and radiation qualified.”
“The more powerful your hardware is, the more vulnerable it is to radiation. You can’t just use earth electronics and expect it to work on the moon.”
That said, Weston believes commodity hardware can be used in space and it’s not true to say “you can’t go anywhere near space without spending $100,000”.
“There’s nothing magical about space, but need to think about the design.”
Lunar Numbat is also in the early stages of developing a radar altimeter for White Label Space, which may incorporate software-defined-radio technology.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Monday Grok: Will Siri crack the walls of GOOG?
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Get the Whole Picture Why Most Organizations Miss User Response Monitoring—and What to Do About It
You can be armed with vast amounts of performance metrics, but if you don’t know what users are actually experiencing, you don’t have the real performance picture. While this measure is critical, it is one many organizations fail to consistently capture. This guide looks at the challenges of user response monitoring, and it shows how you can overcome these challenges and start to get a real handle on your infrastructure performance and how it impacts your users’ experience. -
Three simple steps to better patch security
It’s estimated that 90% of successful attacks against software vulnerabilities could be prevented with an existing patch or configuration setting. Yet patching is a persistent challenge for IT managers. With the glut of patches released each year, how do you know which ones are truly critical security patches and which ones aren’t? And how can you identify which computers are actually missing the patches they need? This paper details a simple approach to patching that gives you better visibility into and control over patch assessment and compliance. -
Best Practices for Implementing a Data Warehouse on the Oracle Exadata Database Machine
Increasingly companies are recognizing the value of an enterprise data warehouse (EDW). A true EDW provides a single 360-degree view of the business and a powerful platform for a wide spectrum of business intelligence tasks ranging from predictive analysis to near real-time strategic and tactical decision support throughout the organization. Ensuring the EDW will get the desired performance and will scale out as your data grows you need to get three fundamental things correct, the hardware configuration, the physical data model and the data loading process. Read on.
-
Objects, Abstraction, Data Structures and Design Using Java 2E
-
Professional Cocoa Application Security
-
AutoCAD 2010 & AutoCAD LT 2010 Bible
-
Introduction to Decision Support System
-
QuarkXpress 6 Bible
-
Windows Home Server
-
Mastering Object Oriented Design in C++
-
Office 2007 Visual Quick Tips
-
Changing Software Development - Learning to Become Agile








Comments
Post new comment