Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

AGIMO releases open source software principles

Open source software still not favoured, but will get greater consideration on government procurements

The Australian Government has released a new policy aiming to strengthen the consideration of open source by agencies in their software procurements.

According to Special Minister of State, Gary Gray, the last policy, released in 2005, sought to favour neither proprietary or open source offerings by maintaining a position of ‘informed neutrality’.

However, since 2005, there had been an increase in the maturity of the open source software products and the use of open source software by governments around the world.

“In recent years, many governments have revised their policies to increase the adoption of open source software,” a post by Gray on the Australian Government Information and Management Office (AGIMO) blog reads.

“This revised Australian Government policy on open source software will ensure that we maintain international best practice and that our purchases of software will continue to reflect best value for money for the Government.”

However, the principles informing the policy appear to maintain the ‘informed neutrality’ position which underpinned the 2005 policy, neither pushing for or against open source; simply that it be considered.

Principle one states that “Australian Government ICT procurement processes must actively and fairly consider all types of available software”, and that for purchases of more than $80,000 agencies are required to include in their procurement plan that open source software will be considered equally alongside proprietary software.

Agencies will also be required to insert a statement into any Request for Tender that they will consider open source software equally alongside proprietary software

Principle two states that suppliers “must consider all types of available software when dealing with Australian Government agencies”, and that suppliers will need to provide justification outlining their consideration and/or exclusion of open source software in their response to the tender.

Principle three states Australian Government agencies will “actively participate in open source software communities and contribute back where appropriate".

Previously the AGIMO has voiced some scepticism about the use of open source software. Commenting at CeBIT Australia 2010, John Sheridan, division manager at AGIMO's Agency Services Division, hinted that open source suppliers would need to lift their levels of support if they were to make further inroads into the public sector.

"Our policy on open source remains one of informed neutrality," he said at the time. "Our view is, rather than preferring one particular sort of open source software to another, to make sure our software can be properly supported.

“Tomorrow in [Senate] Estimates I don’t want to be answering a question about the failure of some government website on the basis that it used technology that required support by posting questions on the web in the hope that someone might be able to give us some idea.”

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: CeBIT, Request DSL
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO), open source, procurement
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Get the Whole Picture Why Most Organizations Miss User Response Monitoring—and What to Do About It
    You can be armed with vast amounts of performance metrics, but if you don’t know what users are actually experiencing, you don’t have the real performance picture. While this measure is critical, it is one many organizations fail to consistently capture. This guide looks at the challenges of user response monitoring, and it shows how you can overcome these challenges and start to get a real handle on your infrastructure performance and how it impacts your users’ experience.
    Learn more »
  • Three simple steps to better patch security
    It’s estimated that 90% of successful attacks against software vulnerabilities could be prevented with an existing patch or configuration setting. Yet patching is a persistent challenge for IT managers. With the glut of patches released each year, how do you know which ones are truly critical security patches and which ones aren’t? And how can you identify which computers are actually missing the patches they need? This paper details a simple approach to patching that gives you better visibility into and control over patch assessment and compliance.
    Learn more »
  • Best Practices for Implementing a Data Warehouse on the Oracle Exadata Database Machine
    Increasingly companies are recognizing the value of an enterprise data warehouse (EDW). A true EDW provides a single 360-degree view of the business and a powerful platform for a wide spectrum of business intelligence tasks ranging from predictive analysis to near real-time strategic and tactical decision support throughout the organization. Ensuring the EDW will get the desired performance and will scale out as your data grows you need to get three fundamental things correct, the hardware configuration, the physical data model and the data loading process. Read on.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments