OECD: Keep broadband competition
- 15 November, 2010 09:13
- Comments 1
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) believes Australia's National Broadband Network (NBN) promises large benefits, but may not be the most cost-effective strategy.
Read the full OECD report summary comments on the NBN.
Releasing its Economic Survey of Australia on Sunday, the OECD says at a cost of $43 billion, or 3.25 per cent of gross domestic product, it also entails "substantial financial uncertainties".
The OECD says the Gillard government's strategy will improve internet services for the entire population and promote a fairer competition between private firms on retail services.
Part of the plan is to shut down Telstra's existing copper network and the country's main cable network.
"While establishing a monopoly in this way would protect the viability of the government's investment project, it may not be optimal for cost efficiency and innovation," the Paris-based institution says.
It says research has stressed the value of competition between technological platforms for the provision of broadband services.
"It would therefore be preferable to maintain competition between technologies in the broadband sector and, within each technology, between internet service providers," it says.
The federal opposition has strongly criticised the government for not producing a business plan for the NBN but key cross-bench independents that helped form a minority government are supportive of the plan.
Last week in a re-released version of the so-called Red Book, Treasury said the NBN program carries significant risks, including financial risks for the public balance sheet and risks around competition and efficiency in telecommunications and related markets.
"The government's response to the NBN Implementation Study will set the parameters for the outcomes in these areas for decades to come," it said.
"It therefore warrants very careful consideration by cabinet in coming months."
The Red Book, which is a series of recommendations from Treasury for the incoming Labor government, was reissued with some restrictions removed that had previously been blacked-out in the document under an FOI.
The coalition's cheaper $6.3 billion broadband and telecommunications plan announced during the August election campaign would select private sector companies to build and execute a national network based on both fixed and wireless technologies.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
NBN build gaining momentum daily: Quigley
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Monday Grok: Will Siri crack the walls of GOOG?
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Backup and Recovery as we Know it is Changing
Increasing complexity in the data centre, including the rapid deployment of virtual servers, ever-expanding compliance requirements, and increasing amounts of sensitive data on mobile devices has put more strain on backup and recovery. Read on. -
Virtualise, Manage, Backup, Consolidate
Datacenter sprawl is one of the larger challenges that datacenter managers are facing today. Over time, applications, servers, and storage can create many unique architectures across the IT infrastructure. This can introduce complexity, increase costs, and compromise business-critical application performance and availability. Read on. -
Bend or break: Flexible Policy
DON’T. PANIC. Aligning business and IT needs has always been a challenge. Finding the right balance between ensuring the safety of sensitive data and enabling the free flow of information is increasingly difficult in today’s evolving regulatory and threat environment. Read on.

















Comments
gnome
If they have been reported correctly, the OECD seems to be applying some strange methodology in their NBN assessment.
With construction and capex extending over nearly a decade, they have chosen to relate the entire cost to one year's GDP, instead of referring to a pro rata comparison spread over the ten years.
Perhaps they thought it might make a better headline.
Post new comment