Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Is Google killing the economy?

A report suggests Google's Web monopoly is a danger to privacy and security, and threatens the economy and the job market

Google is virtually synonymous with the Web, and many have come to embrace virtually every product and service--from Gmail to Android--that Google rolls out. A new study, however, asserts that Google's apparent monopoly stifles competition in many industries, and has an adverse impact on the economy and the job market.

The report, titled "Googleopoly VI Seeing the Big Picture: How Google is Monopolizing Consumer Internet Media & Threatening a Price Deflationary Spiral & Job Losses in a $Trillion Sector", was prepared by Scott Cleland, President of Precursor--a tech communications research and consulting firm. It contains a number of damning assertions about Google's effect on the economy, and implores the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) to wield the antitrust hammer to put a stop to it.

Cleland has prepared a detailed and seemingly well-researched document which presents a number of conclusions including:

• There is no net-economic growth or job creation from Google's "free" Internet sector model, only a deflationary price spiral, negative growth, property devaluation, and hundreds of thousands of job losses in over 20 industries. Consumers don't win long term from a monopoly-gatekeeper of "free" information access and distribution.

• Lax antitrust merger enforcement is responsible for tipping Google to monopoly and facilitating its monopolization of consumer Internet media. If antitrust authorities do not wake up soon, a wide swath of a trillion dollar sector with millions of jobs-- i.e. video, maps, books, analytics, travel, etc.--will suffer the same fate as the music and newspaper industries.

• When Google rebrands its current YouTube-Double-Click video advertising business as "Google TV" this fall, it already will own an Internet video-streaming monopoly with 80 percent of the Internet audience, almost a billion viewers, 2 billion daily monetized views, and 45 billion ads served daily.

The report states that "Google is a vastly more serious antitrust threat to consumers and the economy than Microsoft, because the DOJ blocked Microsoft from extending its monopoly vertically into the broader economy, while antitrust authorities have unwittingly aided and abetted Google's vertical monopolization of vast parts of the broader economy."

There are many valid points in the report, ultimately arriving at the conclusion that the reality of Google is very different from its "Do No Evil" mantra. However, it also paints Google in a specifically damning light that may not be entirely accurate depending on your point of view.

It seems difficult to fault Google for making so many products and services available for free. Services like Gmail, Google Voice, Google Docs, and other products provide many users with access to tools they might not otherwise be able to afford. It can be argued that the Internet is only as universally valuable as it is as a result of contributions such as this from Google.

It is also worth noting that Google emerged at a time when many were making the same sorts of accusations against the growing threat of a Microsoft monopoly. With Yahoo and others already dominating the market, it seemed unlikely that a startup named "Google" could even compete in the search industry, much less evolve into a giant on par with Microsoft itself in only a decade.

If Google could start from nothing and take on Microsoft, it seems that the possibility still exists for a company to come along and knock Google off its perch as well. Facebook is an example of a company that emerged from the shadow of Google's Web dominance and yet has managed to capture its own market and rise to challenge Google directly in many ways.

The report itself may be an extreme point of view, but it does seem that the DOJ has treated the rise of Google differently than the rise of Microsoft, and that Google's virtually ubiquitous access to the data on the Internet poses a variety of security and privacy concerns. But, I think it is more accurate to suggest that Google is guilty of benign neglect than overt evil.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Department of Justice, DOJ, Evolve, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Google, internet, legal issues, online privacy
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Data Center Physical Infrastructure: Optimising Business Value
    To stay competitive in today’s rapidly changing business world, companies must update the way they view the value of their investment in data center physical infrastructure (DCPI). No longer are simply availability and upfront cost sufficient to make adequate business decisions. Agility, or business flexibility, and low total cost of ownership have become equally important to companies that will succeed in a changing global marketplace.
    Learn more »
  • Closing the print security gap - The market landscape for print security
    Today, many organisations continue to rely on printing to support business processes, particularly in the public sector, finance industry and legal profession. Whilst MFPs and printers have improved business productivity, they pose the same security risk as any networked device if left unprotected. With reported data breaches on the rise and growing industry and regulatory requirements around information security, businesses may suffer financial and reputational damage if they ignore the risks of unsecured printing. Read more.
    Learn more »
  • Transforming Software Delivery: An IBM Rational Case Study
    The IBM Rational® software development organization consists of more than 2000 analysts, architects, project managers, developers, and quality professionals distributed over 15 locations on six continents. Our mission is to ensure the success of our customers through the development of a robust portfolio of software and systems delivery products. We create and maintain 57 product families that span distributed, System z®, and Power® operating environments.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments