Organisations fail to measure the costs of information and system defects
- 05 July, 2010 15:45
- Comments 2
Veronica Coyle from Altis Consulting
Many organisations are failing to measure costs of information and system defects despite these issues being relatively easy to fix.
Principal consultant at Altis Consulting, Veronica Coyle, has termed the phenomena "death by a thousand cuts or, the fall and fall of information system quality".
Coyle said while daily issues with data systems may seem easy to resolve, the problems could be costly if businesses don't address them early on.
"Most organisations have never measured the costs of information and system defects. While there are a number of well documented examples where companies have suffered large costs from individual quality defects, these are generally not a daily occurence.
"However, the many, many system and data issues that are daily occurences have small costs individually and are therefore seen as relatively harmless. The combined cost of these quality defects is rarely considered or measured," Coyle said.
Coyle said while the small "cuts" to a business' data systems will not mean the end of the business, it does mean more profits are lost in the long term.
"The results of these thousands of small cuts may not be death for the businesses, but until organisations wake up and measure the costs and the impact on their bottom line, they will continue to bleed a little more profit every day," she said.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- Top Ten Considerations when Deploying IT Operations Management in the Cloud
- Storage Virtualisation - What to Know and What to Look For
- NAND Flash Solid State Storage for the Enterprise
- NZ Government selects HP as panel print supplier for All-of-Government contract
- Business Intelligence and Performance Management Publication: Organizing for Management Excellence, Part 2
-
All Systems Down
-
Married to your desk? 5 tips for a better relationship
-
Married to your desk? 5 tips for a better relationship
-
NBN to deliver disability support services to regional Australia
-
Beware of malicious QR codes: Report
-
Migrating from NFSv3 to NFSv4
In April 2003, the Network File System (NFS) version 4 Protocol was ratified as an Internet standard, described in RFC-35301, which superseded NFS Version 3 (NFSv3, specified in RFC-18132). Since the ratification of NFSv4, further advances have been made to the standard, notably NFSv4.1 (as described in RFC-56613, ratified in January 2010) that includes several new features such as parallel NFS (pNFS). -
Optimizing Storage and Protecting Data with Oracle Database 11g
This paper focuses on key Oracle Database 11g capabilities that help IT departments better optimise their storage infrastructure, enabling administrators to deliver a cost-effective, scalable data management platform that is easy to manage, reduces costs, and protects data while continuing to deliver the performance and availability that today’s businesses require. -
Storage Virtualisation - What to Know and What to Look For
All too often in IT generally—and in storage infrastructures specifically—there’s a tendency for an “assumption gap” to exist. This paper is an attempt to close that gap; in a pragmatic and accessible manner, it covers the real value of storage virtualisation (from both business and IT perspectives) and offers explanations of the varying storage virtualisation approaches with advice on how to make a technology and vendor decision.
-
HTML, XHTML and CSS All-In-One for Dummies®, 2nd Edition
-
Secrets of Award-winning Digital Artists
-
Information Systems
-
Web Site Privacy with P3P
-
Powerbook and Ibook Digital Field Guide
-
Flash MX Learning Studio Boxed Set
-
Innocent Code - a Security Wake-up Call for Web Programmers
-
Google® Business Solutions All-In-One for Dummies®
-
Beginning Javascript, 3rd Edition









Comments
Lizz Robb
Amen to that! I never tire of pointing this out but business tends to be short-term in its thinking these days, which is a problem in itself. A reduced headcount is far more attention getting in short-term cost saving terms (the big driver for many organizations) than any attention to improved quality.
At the end if the day, rightly or perhaps more wrongly, what gets rewarded gets done. So unless the organization is quality driven, it will keep bleeding in terms of the bottom line, quality and market share.
Monique Attinger
In the pursuit of economic "efficiency", organizations lose sight of the fact that "quality" is what will bring a customers back - and without those customers, the business does not thrive. Often, "small" problems with internal systems result in poorer quality service to customers which leads to poorer customer retention - a link that many organizations are still yet to make.
Post new comment