Oracle loses XML co-inventor to Google
- 16 March, 2010 06:53
- Comments
One ex-Sun Microsystems employee who will not be cashing an Oracle paycheck is XML co-inventor Tim Bray, who has opted instead to work for the Google.
Bray will be working, beginning on Monday, as a developer-advocate for the company's Android development team, according to an announcement on his blog.
"I'd had an offer to stay with Oracle which I decided to decline; I'll maybe tell the story when I can think about it without getting that weird spiking-blood-pressure sensation in my eyeballs," Bray wrote. Bray was formerly the director of Web technologies for Sun.
Bray is perhaps best known as one of the creators of XML (Extensible Markup Language), an open-format marking up data so that it can be reused by multiple systems. The widely used XML subsequently served as the basis for most Web services protocols, as well as the massively popular RSS (Really Simple Syndication).
Oracle traditionally has been an advocate of XML, using it as the lingua franca to allow the different components of its next-generation Fusion middleware to share information.
In the blog entry, Bray noted several reasons for moving to Google, most of them centered on Android. Bray said he admired for the Android project for being open source, for its application programming interfaces, and for the fact that it competes with Apple's iPhone.
"The iPhone vision of the mobile Internet's future" is "a sterile Disney-fied walled garden surrounded by sharp-toothed lawyers. The people who create the apps serve at the landlord's pleasure and fear his anger," Bray wrote.
Bray is not the only ex-Sun employee who is now blogging with frankness about the IT world. Sun CEO Jonathon Schwartz started a blog upon his departure of Sun, after the acquisition, as did chief open source officer Simon Phipps.
In January, Oracle closed its purchase of Sun Microsystems.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- ongoing by Tim Bray · Now A No-Evil Zone
- Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)
- XML: A Standard that Every CIO Should Know - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership
- OASIS: Advancing open standards for the global information society
- advocate
- Middleware : Fusion Middleware 11g : Oracle
- Ex-Sun chief dishes dirt on Gates, Jobs
- What I Couldn't Say…
- ✍ Last Day At Sun « Wild Webmink
- Oracle and Sun
-
Australia's first 4G smartphone is the HTC Velocity 4G
-
Swedish e-commerce startup's execs linked to NYC sex crime
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
How to implement next-generation storage infrastructure for Big Data
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
Get the Whole Picture Why Most Organizations Miss User Response Monitoring—and What to Do About It
You can be armed with vast amounts of performance metrics, but if you don’t know what users are actually experiencing, you don’t have the real performance picture. While this measure is critical, it is one many organizations fail to consistently capture. This guide looks at the challenges of user response monitoring, and it shows how you can overcome these challenges and start to get a real handle on your infrastructure performance and how it impacts your users’ experience. -
Endpoint Buyers Guide
It takes more than antivirus to stop today’s advanced threats. Protecting corporate assets requires a complete security solution that includes anti-malware, host-based intrusion prevention (HIPS), web protection, patch assessment, application and device control, network access control, data loss prevention, firewall and other capabilities. In short, you need an endpoint protection solution. We examine the top vendors according to market share and industry analysis: Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Sophos, Symantec and Trend Micro. Each vendor’s solutions are evaluated according to: Product features and capabilities, Effectiveness, Performance, Usability, Data protection, and Technical support. -
Business Intelligence Best Practices for Dashboard Design
Even if a dashboard’s appearance looks professional and is aesthetically pleasing, appearances can be deceiving. Although visual design is important, it is also important to ask yourself: Is the data reliable? Is it timely? Is any data missing? Is it consistent across all dashboards?. This paper offers an overview of best practice business intelligence (BI) dashboard design principles and discusses data integration options for getting data into a dashboard.

















Comments
Post new comment