Project Governance Part 5: Project Governance as Managing
- 15 December, 2009 09:10
- Comments
The Project Sponsor should manage the project manager! Now, this may be news to some project managers (and some Project Sponsors!)...
The belief that all of the managing is done by the project manager is fallacious. While project governance is essentially a hands-off role, there are areas that the governance team has to manage.
These areas include – the project manager and team, (and for the Project Sponsor) the Steering Committee, key stakeholders, the scope, contingency funding and the project’s ongoing relevance and viability.
One critical area that the governance team manages is "the critical success factors" (CSFs) – those factors that are outside the control and management of the project team but need to happen or exist for the project to be successful. These are the accountability of the governance team to manage.
Some CSFs cannot be managed as they are outside the control of the organization, but these still need to be monitored as their existence or changes to their status can be critical to the project's success.
Essentially, the governance team needs to be manage a range of people, factors and issues to ensure the success of the project.
If the governance team believes that they can leave their "management hat" at the door, they are mistaken.
But, conversely, project governance is not project management. The governance team manages the key dimensions of the investment and its value realization – the project manager manages the project. Governance is not super-project management.
How does your governance process compare? Tell me Jed_Simms@capability.com.au
Jed Simms is CIO magazine's project management columnist. Simms, founder of projects and benefits delivery research firm Capability Management, is also the developer of specialised project management and project governance Web site valuedeliverymanagement.com
To read Jed Simms’ previous 7-part series on developing a business case click here.
For previous project management articles by Jed Simms visit Project Governance Part 1: Non-understood Project Governance, Project Governance Part 2: Project Governance as Leadership, Project Governance Part 3: Project Governance as Facilitation, Project Governance Part 4: Project Governance as the Approving body, How Do You Know if Your PMO is Successful, "PMO: What’s In A Name?" and "The Self Evident Truths of Project Management".
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- new
- THE BUSINESS CASE # 1 – Myths and Misunderstandings
- Project Governance Part 1: Non-understood Project Governance
- Project Governance Part 2: Project Governance as Leadership
- Project Governance Part 3: Project Governance as Facilitation
- Project Governance Part 4: Project Governance as the Approving body
- How Do You Know if Your PMO is Successful? Part I: Constraints Management Services
- PMO: What’s in a name?
- The Self Evident Truths of Project Management: Truth #1 - We Do Projects to Realise the Associated Benefits
-
The 30 best Safari extensions -- so far
-
Apple and Google disagree over licensing of essential patents
-
Monash Uni reduces IT teams after consolidation project
-
FTC warns makers of background checking apps
-
QLD govt demands answers after pay glitch
-
Prepare Your Enterprise for the Mobile Revolution: Boost the Bottom Line with Mobile UC
This white paper will highlight the changes in the mobile workplace; outline the benefits of unified communications (UC) and Fixed-Mobile Convergence (FMC) for mobile workers; identify the key market trends and business challenges IT managers must pay attention to now and into the future; and offer best practices for choosing a solution that will deliver clear ROI. -
A Governance Guide for Hybrid SharePoint Migrations
Cloud-based computing represents a powerful new option for managing enterprise content, offering increased flexibility, efficiency, and reduced cost for IT infrastructure, data storage, and applications. However, for a variety of business and technical reasons, most organisations will take a phased approach to adopting cloud-based services, which will require them to continue to maintain their on-premises SharePoint environments during the transition. This white paper, written by Chris Beckett from SharePoint Bits, discusses some of the benefits and risks of hybrid SharePoint deployments, and presents governance considerations that are essential for ensuring a successful migration. -
Email Encryption/Decryption and Signing integrated into a comprehensive content security solution
Clearswift’s SECURE Email Gateway provides an easy to use approach to providing secure email conversations. The technology enables customers to provide the privacy, authenticity and integrity of the communication that secure messaging offers, but without the complexity and high administration cost of other systems. The Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway with integrated encryption technology enables business to communicate with confidence and protects them from the risk of sensitive data loss.
-
Bodyshop
-
Wireless Devices End to End
-
Windows Server 2003 Security Bible
-
Numerical Simulations and Case Studies Using Visual C++.net
-
Web Design Complete Course
-
Software Engineering (Foreword By Barry W. Boehm)
-
Apache Tomcat Bible
-
The C++ Standard - Incorporating Technical Corrigendum No.1
-
Switching to a Mac for Dummies®, 2nd Edition











Comments
Post new comment