Microsoft makes case for upgrade to Exchange 2010
- 10 November, 2009 08:13
- Comments 1
Microsoft is emphasizing the potentially money-saving features of Exchange 2010, the latest revamp of its e-mail application officially released Monday at its TechEd European customer conference in Berlin.
With Exchange 2010, Microsoft is trying to entice CIOs in a tough economic environment to upgrade, contending that Exchange 2010's new features lets companies buy cheaper storage systems, eliminate their voice-mail systems and drop licenses for separate e-mail archiving software.
Although enterprise e-mail changes and deployments can take much time, Microsoft expects Exchange 2010 to be "quite aggressively deployed," said Stephen Elop, president of Microsoft's business division, which oversees products such as the Office suite.
As part of its case to customers, Microsoft is citing a study it commissioned from research analyst Forrester. The study says that companies can expect to recoup their costs of deploying Exchange 2010 within six months through savings in other areas.
Exchange 2010 can now be used with less expensive attached storage devices rather than SANs (storage area networks), Elop said. Another money-saving feature is Exchange's ability to take voice mail messages.
A speech-to-text feature let users read rather than listen to the messages. Microsoft has also added an e-mail archiving feature, which Elop said eliminates the need for companies to purchase other archiving software.
The new version has other features to make e-mail more manageable, such as conversation threading, the ability to ignore ongoing conversations between co-workers, and protections to ensure that e-mail with sensitive information isn't released. On the security side, Microsoft also released Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange.
At the conference, Microsoft is also pushing Windows Server 2008 R2, the latest version of the server product. Last week, Microsoft made an abrupt change to its product roadmap.
The company was not planning on making Exchange 2007 compatible with Windows Server 2008 R2. It meant that those who wanted to upgrade to the latest server product also had to use Exchange 2010.
"Earlier this year we made a decision in one direction, and due to the feedback we have received on this blog and elsewhere, we have reconsidered," wrote Kevin Allison, a general manager for Exchange, on a blog.
"In the coming calendar year we will issue an update for Exchange 2007 enabling full support of Windows Server 2008 R2."
Microsoft has not given a date when the update may be released.
In other news at TechEd, Microsoft released a community technology preview for SQL Server 2008 R2, which will be available for download on the company's Web site.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- Prepare Your Enterprise for the Mobile Revolution: Boost the Bottom Line with Mobile UC
- Case Study - TNT Express successfully reduces their paper usage and costs using a new document solution
- CSO Security Buyers Guide 2011
- SOA Best Practices and Design Patterns
- Justifying Business Intelligence Applications
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
Phones are distractions during catch-ups
-
Google's Sidewiki lets people post comments about Web pages
-
Leaving your job? Take your data with you
-
Oracle x86 Rack Servers Optimized for Rapid Deployments and Operational Efficiency
Business-critical and mission-critical workloads demanding applications and databases require stable and secure environments. When these types of workloads are deployed on x86 servers, the need to ensure business continuity, maximum uptime, and consistent processing means that IT managers and business unit managers are looking at enterprise x86 servers in a new way: They realize that the business depends on these servers and that x86 server platforms for the enterprise are no longer expendable, as they might have been when servers were dedicated to a single application or when they were deployed as small Web servers that could be easily taken offline and replaced. -
A Data Center Fabric Is Critical to a Next-Generation Unified Data Center
The data center has gone through several major evolutionary changes over the past several decades, and each change has been defined by major shifts in computing. The shift to a virtual data center will be the single biggest transition in the history of computing. This transition will reshape all the major data center tiers: applications, storage, servers and the network. This paper examines the drivers of this transition, provides real-world case studies and includes data centre fabric best practices. -
Managing IBM License Complexity
IBM provides thousands of products in its portfolio and uses a variety of license models, contract terms and conditions. These license models can be very complex, causing frequent confusion for organisations trying to grasp the concepts while maintaining license compliance. While at first IBM licensing may seem incomprehensible, some education on the license models and licensing scenarios will help minimise the confusion. In addition, a more automated approach to managing licenses enables organisations to gain control, reduce ongoing software costs and minimise license liability risks. Read on.
-
Maya Visual Effects
-
Microsoft Office Word 2007 International Student Edition (77-601)
-
Twitter Marketing for Dummies
-
Mac OS X Tiger Timesaving Techniques for Dummies
-
Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2007 International Student Edition (77-603)
-
Ground-up Java (Includes CD-ROM)
-
Mysql/PHP Database Applications, Second Edition
-
Information Development
-
Mastering Digital Photography and Imaging








Comments
Harsha
Savings are Myth. I calculated for my org and it is turning out I have to spend close to a $1 Million for 2000 users to implement this. Could someone show me the savings???? or atleast a pay back in 6 yrs?
Post new comment