Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

THE BUSINESS CASE 6 -- Accountabilities

A business case is just words unless someone is accountable for delivering the project's promised value.

CIO brings you an ongoing series on project management from Jed Simms on a vital component of any project: the business case.

The business case is just words unless someone is taking accountability for its delivery. If you’re going to give someone $10m you’d want them to be committed to and accountable for delivering the promised value proposition.

The Project Sponsor is primarily accountable for delivering the value proposition -- this is their commitment. They need to understand it, ‘own’ it and know that they’re going to be measured on its achievement.

The Project Manager is primarily accountable for delivering the project or program to enable, support and deliver the value proposition -- this is their commitment. If the project/program fails to deliver or delivers to an inadequate standard, the business value will be diminished and the project manager will have failed in his or her commitment.

The Steering Committee (or Project Board) is accountable for facilitating the success of the project/program in long term business terms, and ‘steering’ it successfully into the business so that the outcomes, benefits and value can be realised in full. Like the Project Sponsor, their accountability outlasts the project and continues until the benefits have been realised in full.

Various technical, risk and financial experts are accountable for assessing and asserting that the project as proposed is feasible and in alignment with any required standards, policies et al. If the solution is, for example, subsequently found to not be technically feasible, the technical expert should be shot, not the project manager.

At the end of this section you need to have established:

  • which executive is taking full accountability for the successful delivery of the value (and their experience/competency to take on the role)

  • which project manager is taking full accountability for the project’s successful delivery (and their experience/competency to take on the role)

  • which executives are taking accountability for ensuring the project’s successful adoption into the business (and their experience/competency to take on the role)

  • which experts have taken accountability for ensuring the project is valid, compliant and feasible.

How does your business case process compare? Tell me Jed_Simms@capability.com.au


Jed Simms is CIO magazine's project management columnist. Simms, founder of projects and benefits delivery research firm Capability Management, is also the developer of specialised project management and project governance Web site valuedeliverymanagement.com

To view the first article in this series, click here.

To view the last article in this series, click here.

For previous series of project management articles by Jed Simms visit How Do You Know if Your PMO is Successful, "PMO: What’s In A Name?" and “The Self Evident Truths of Project Management”.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: ASE, Simms International
References show all
Comments are now closed.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: project management, jed simms
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • World Quality Report - The State of Quality 2012
    The most comprehensive assessment of the current state of enterprise application quality and testing practices available from around the world. With our 1550 respondents, Capgemini, HP & Sogeti bring you the full report. Download today.
    Learn more »
  • Spear-Phishing Email: Most Favored APT Attack Bait
    This research paper presents findings on APT-related spear phishing from February to September 2012. We analysed APT-related spear-phishing emails collected throughout this period to understand and mitigate attacks. The information we gathered not only allowed us to obtain specific details on spear phishing but also on targeted attacks. We found, for instance, that 91% of targeted attacks involve spear-phishing emails, reinforcing the belief that spear phishing is a primary means by which APT attackers infiltrate target networks.
    Learn more »
  • NetApp FAS6240 Clustered SAN Champion of Champions
    Storage systems today must match agility with diversified I/O performance to satisfy an enterprise’s changing needs. In their review, Silverton Consulting ranks the NetApp FAS6240 Clustered SAN, as an Enterprise OLTP “Champion of Champions.” Read the results of their benchmark testing and the features that impressed them the most.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments