THE BUSINESS CASE# 4 – The Resources Needed
- 01 September, 2009 11:05
- Comments
CIO brings you an ongoing series on project management from Jed Simms on a vital component of any project: the business case.
Hey, now we get to the costs. But the costs are now ‘the costs of delivering the value’ (rather than the benefits being the off set of the costs — a very different perspective).
By now the costs should have been optimised using the 90-60 rule — focused on realising 90 per cent of the value for 60 per cent of the cost. This can be done by tracking the cost of delivering each outcome and its associated benefits and seeing which outcomes/benefits are not worth the additional costs of delivery. These low worth outcomes/benefits can be culled with minimal value loss but, often, with significant cost savings.
Using this approach we’ve reduced projects initially costed at, for example, $82m to $35m with minimal value loss.
If you’ve not optimised your project costs you’re potentially wasting a lot of money. This makes your business case worse or harder to justify.
In addition to funds projects also need people, skill sets and other resources. These have to be either released by the organisation to work on the project or acquired. You need to justify why you need these resources and why you can’t do with, say, 40 per cent less. As we know from “The Mythical Man Month” the bigger the project team the lesser the productivity and the slower the speed of delivery.
On larger projects and programs facilities, premises, technology, computing capacity and other resources will be needed. These all need to be spelled out as they are part of the evaluation of whether this project is doable in terms of the resources required. If the organisation will not or cannot make the necessary resources available the project cannot be go ahead.
At the end of this section you need to have established:
A) The financial funding required and that this is the optimised cost;
B) What other resources are required (and their availability if known).
This is what you’re asking the organisation to commit to deliver in order to get the value.
How does your business case process compare? Tell me Jed_Simms@capability.com.au Further support and useful tools to help you manage your investments, projects and portfolio are available from .
To view the first article in this series, click here.
To view the last article in this series, click here.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
Spiceworks' free management software gets integrated MDM
-
Opinion: Why national e-health is not for everyone
-
Opinion: Why national e-health is not for everyone
-
Opinion: Why national e-health is not for everyone
-
Opinion: Why national e-health is not for everyone
-
Endpoint Security and Virtualisation
Besides form factor, virtual systems are not really that different than physical systems. They both use the same operating systems and applications. They both present users with computing resources such as RAM and hard drives. Consequently, the ability to exploit vulnerabilities in a physical environment will present a significant threat to virtualised environments as well. This paper examines the different endpoint security methods for virtualised environments and presents how Endpoint Protection security provides optimal performance, protection and manageability. -
Advanced Targeted Attacks
The new threat landscape has changed. Cybercriminals are aggressively pursuing valuable data assets, such as financial transaction information, product design blueprints, user credentials to sensitive systems, and other intellectual property. Simply put, the cyber offense has outpaced the defensive technologies used by most companies today. Find out more on how to protect against the next generation of cyber-attacks. -
Spear-Phishing Email: Most Favored APT Attack Bait
This research paper presents findings on APT-related spear phishing from February to September 2012. We analysed APT-related spear-phishing emails collected throughout this period to understand and mitigate attacks. The information we gathered not only allowed us to obtain specific details on spear phishing but also on targeted attacks. We found, for instance, that 91% of targeted attacks involve spear-phishing emails, reinforcing the belief that spear phishing is a primary means by which APT attackers infiltrate target networks.
















