Microsoft-Yahoo deal: three reasons why Google should sweat it
- 26 August, 2009 05:42
- Comments
With the arrival of the Bing search engine and the Microsoft-Yahoo search partnership, it's been a hectic summer for search - not that you'll see market leader Google sweating.
With a united front building against its cash cow search business, Google is playing it cool.
Google CEO Eric Schmidt said back in June about Bing: "I don't think Bing's arrival has changed what we're doing. We are about search, we're about making things enormously successful, by virtue of innovation." For the most part Google is ignoring Bing, at least publicly. Google has not made any outward strategic moves that imply worry about Bing or the Microsoft-Yahoo partnership, other than to state that it's bad for innovation and competition.
Indeed, the Microsoft-Yahoo partnership will face the scrutiny of antitrust regulators and some experts question whether the partnership will be approved.
But if the partnership does pass legal muster, the search wizards in Mountain View will have a legitimate threat on deck. Microsoft has the money ($100 million is being spent on Bing marketing) and Yahoo has the users (98 million Yahoo Mail users in the United States, four times as many as Gmail). Both companies have the technology.
Google's plan, according to an upcoming Time magazine feature story, is to keep on innovating in search and let Microsoft mass market the heck out of Bing. But here are three reasons why quietly innovating may not be enough to keep the tenacious Microhoo at bay.
Microsoft Has Deep Pockets and Dogged Commitment to Search
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has made it clear that Microsoft's foray into search is not a flirtation, it's a marriage. He said at Bing's launch in late May: "Bing is an important first step forward in our long-term effort to deliver innovations in search."
Microsoft has said that it plans to spend 5 to 10 percent of its operating income on search over the next five years, a number that works out to be roughly $10 billion per year.
From the outset, Microsoft pointed all its guns at Google with Bing, working to make its interface warm and colorful and structure its search results into categories, as opposed to Google's minimalist interface and long list of links. The subsequent $100 million ad campaign for Bing has focused on how it is more organized and user-friendly than Google.
So far, Microsoft's investment in Bing has paid off. In June and July, Bing's market share increased nearly a full percentage point, from 8.0 percent to 8.9 percent.
Google Doesn't Market Itself
Google is one of those companies, like Starbucks, that doesn't do much consumer advertising. Why should they? When your company name is a worldwide verb, you don't exactly need to get the word out. But with the Microsoft-Yahoo partnership, the ground is starting to shift under Google.
The Bing ads have changed perceptions. They rather humorously portray Google's search results as a random collection of links, many of them useless. If anything, the ads have made people question, for probably the first time, whether Google's search is the best way.
The Time magazine story mentions that Google's search engine does have features that most users don't even know about such as providing "the local weather and movie times and performing currency conversions with a single search query."
With the Bing ads getting more prevalent and aggressive, Google may be forced into responding with ads that remind us why Google's search engine became so popular in the first place.
Google Depends Almost Solely on Search for Revenue
Online search advertising is Google's cash cow, responsible for nearly all - 97 percent - of the company's revenue, according to published reports. Microsoft-Yahoo is arguably the biggest threat to that revenue stream in Google's short but wildly successful history.
Just as Microsoft is diversifying beyond its cash cows - Windows and Office - Google is expanding to areas outside of search such as mobile (Android), browsers (Chrome), PCs (the upcoming Chrome OS) and productivity software (Google Apps). But all of these products are essentially a way to get more people searching the Web. It all comes back to online search ads.
Google is still the search king. Its 64.7 percent search market share is still dominant. But for the first time, Google's entire business is threatened by an ambitious, well-financed partnership bent on search success. Wouldn't you be nervous?
Are you a Tweeter? Follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/smoneill. Follow everything from CIO.com on Twitter at twitter.com/CIOonline.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- Google's Schmidt dings Bing : Webware - CNET
- Microsoft-Yahoo Deal May Hurt Competition, Google Exec Says - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership
- Antitrust Attorney: Microsoft-Yahoo Deal Won't Pass Regulatory Muster - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership
- Search Engine Rivals: Bing vs. Google - TIME
- Bing on the Upswing, Say July Search Numbers : CIO - Blogs and Discussion
- YouTube - Microsoft Bing #2 Commercial (Cure for Search Overload Syndrome)
-
The 30 best Safari extensions -- so far
-
Apple and Google disagree over licensing of essential patents
-
Monash Uni reduces IT teams after consolidation project
-
FTC warns makers of background checking apps
-
QLD govt demands answers after pay glitch
-
Backup and Recovery as we Know it is Changing
Increasing complexity in the data centre, including the rapid deployment of virtual servers, ever-expanding compliance requirements, and increasing amounts of sensitive data on mobile devices has put more strain on backup and recovery. Read on. -
Ten ways to save money with IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
According to a recent report by Gartner, “By 2014, at least 30% of organizations will have changed backup vendors due to frustration over cost, complexity and/or capability. ”However, replacing a backup infrastructure can be a painful and disruptive process. The best replacement solution will beone that not only addresses these issues, but also demonstrates significant cost savings, enables a rapid return on investment and ensures a seamless transition.This white paper describes 10 ways that IBM® Tivoli® Storage Manager solutions can help organizations save money while addressing their data storage challenges, including those associated with exponential data growth. -
Printer Usage and Cost Management Strategies for the Australian Mid-market, an Unrealised Opportunity
This whitepaper was commissioned to aid senior business and ICT decision makers of medium-sized government and corporate organisations, including marketing, finance, and technology executives to better understand the current use of print devices including copiers, printers and multi-function Page 19 Reproductions in whole or in part are prohibited. This whitepaper also provides insights into how current management practices can be improved to optimise investments and improve sustainability. Read on.




















Comments
Post new comment