Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

THE BUSINESS CASE #2 – Why are we considering this?

CIO brings you an ongoing series on project management from Jed Simms on a vital component of any project: the business case.

The first section of a business case needs to justify why we are even considering this project/program. If you can’t justify its reason, rationale and relevance than the project should be immediately culled.

The project’s relevance needs to be established primarily in terms of its contribution to the organisation’s strategy. In one client they had prioritised their projects and a call centre improvement project had been rated number two priority. When we introduced our simple, objective strategy contribution measurement process this number two project disappeared! It had absolutely no relevance to the strategic imperatives of the organisation.

However, very few organizations have a simple way of measuring each project’s strategic contribution. Usually a few vague lines claiming strategic alignment exist which are meaningless, unmeasurable and not comparable across projects — ie useless. Yet the level of strategic contribution should be the first question asked of any project.

Having an effective strategic contribution measurement process is a highly effective way of enabling Sponsors to self-cull their good but irrelevant ideas and initiatives early.

Another key reason for a project can be the costs and risks of doing nothing. A high cost/risk of doing nothing is, by itself, not sufficient justification for your specific business proposal but a justification for doing something. The rest of your business case needs to establish that your proposal is the best approach to addressing these costs/risks.

If a project is ‘mandatory’ (by which I mean required for legal or regulatory compliance reasons) it does not get a free pass; it has to show that either the solution proposed is the least cost solution possible (why spend money when you don’t have to on some fancy solution?) or that the mandatory requirement has been translated into a value-adding opportunity which then has to justify its relative value.

I also add into this section the analysis of the scale, size and complexity of the project so that you can assess the organizational capability required to deliver it. The more complex the project, the more organisational project delivery capability required. Too many organisations take on projects that they just don’t have the capability to deliver successfully. Let’s identify this early and cull it if necessary. At the end of this section you need to have established …

1)That there is a reason and need for this project;

2) It is relevant to and contributes sufficiently to our strategy and its imperatives;

3) It is doable by us as an organization (otherwise, why start?);

4) The alternative costs/risks of doing nothing are too high;

5)And, if a mandatory project, this is a least-cost or the value opportunity solution.

How does your business case process compare? Tell me Jed_Simms@capability.com.au

Further support and useful tools to help you manage your investments, projects and portfolio are available from .

To view the first article in this series, click here.

To view the last article in this series, click here.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: ASE, Simms International
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: jed simms, project management
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Reconciling Datacenter consolidation and security: It starts with an integrated approach
    There is no question that datacenter consolidation has gone mainstream. A recent IDG Research survey of IT managers found that three out of four organizations are in the midst of, or just completing, consolidation of multiple applications or systems onto a smaller number of servers. Improving performance and availability was the key driver of consolidation efforts for 85% of those surveyed.
    Learn more »
  • Blurring boundaries: The disappearing gap between work and home life
    Call it multi-tasking, life-splicing or bleisure but increasingly, fuelled by advances in technology, employees are blurring the boundaries between home and work. ‘Generation Standby’ employees, never truly ‘switched off’ and always ready to be called upon, are now enjoying, and expecting, greater levels of flexibility and mobility than ever before. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • Justifying Business Intelligence Applications
    This white paper explores the decision criteria used in a build vs. buy scenario when considering the Oracle BI Applications. The major benefits of the BI Applications will be discussed in the framework of an overall buy vs. build argument.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments