THE BUSINESS CASE #2 – Why are we considering this?
- 25 August, 2009 12:45
- Comments
CIO brings you an ongoing series on project management from Jed Simms on a vital component of any project: the business case.
The first section of a business case needs to justify why we are even considering this project/program. If you can’t justify its reason, rationale and relevance than the project should be immediately culled.
The project’s relevance needs to be established primarily in terms of its contribution to the organisation’s strategy. In one client they had prioritised their projects and a call centre improvement project had been rated number two priority. When we introduced our simple, objective strategy contribution measurement process this number two project disappeared! It had absolutely no relevance to the strategic imperatives of the organisation.
However, very few organizations have a simple way of measuring each project’s strategic contribution. Usually a few vague lines claiming strategic alignment exist which are meaningless, unmeasurable and not comparable across projects — ie useless. Yet the level of strategic contribution should be the first question asked of any project.
Having an effective strategic contribution measurement process is a highly effective way of enabling Sponsors to self-cull their good but irrelevant ideas and initiatives early.
Another key reason for a project can be the costs and risks of doing nothing. A high cost/risk of doing nothing is, by itself, not sufficient justification for your specific business proposal but a justification for doing something. The rest of your business case needs to establish that your proposal is the best approach to addressing these costs/risks.
If a project is ‘mandatory’ (by which I mean required for legal or regulatory compliance reasons) it does not get a free pass; it has to show that either the solution proposed is the least cost solution possible (why spend money when you don’t have to on some fancy solution?) or that the mandatory requirement has been translated into a value-adding opportunity which then has to justify its relative value.
I also add into this section the analysis of the scale, size and complexity of the project so that you can assess the organizational capability required to deliver it. The more complex the project, the more organisational project delivery capability required. Too many organisations take on projects that they just don’t have the capability to deliver successfully. Let’s identify this early and cull it if necessary. At the end of this section you need to have established …
1)That there is a reason and need for this project;
2) It is relevant to and contributes sufficiently to our strategy and its imperatives;
3) It is doable by us as an organization (otherwise, why start?);
4) The alternative costs/risks of doing nothing are too high;
5)And, if a mandatory project, this is a least-cost or the value opportunity solution.
How does your business case process compare? Tell me Jed_Simms@capability.com.au
Further support and useful tools to help you manage your investments, projects and portfolio are available from .
To view the first article in this series, click here.
To view the last article in this series, click here.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
The 30 best Safari extensions -- so far
-
Apple and Google disagree over licensing of essential patents
-
Monash Uni reduces IT teams after consolidation project
-
FTC warns makers of background checking apps
-
QLD govt demands answers after pay glitch
-
How to Choose an SMB - Unified Communications as a Service (UCAAS) Solution
The on-premise deployment of Unified Communications (UC) continues to be a source of considerable corporate angst especially for the Small to Medium Business (SMB) sector. IT research firm Gartner believes UCaaS will be adopted as an adjunct service by large enterprises and as a core service by SMBs before 2015. To help SMBs choose the best offering and develop a suitable roadmap Computerworld has prepared this special feature profiling the major offerings in the Australian market. -
How and Why to Create Data Destruction Policies
Quick solutions to understanding a data destruction policy and key points on ways to implement them into your workplace. -
Sanmina-SCI | Webcast
The IT team at Sanmina-SCI works in the competitive high-tech manufacturing industry. It must constantly look for ways to improve service levels while cutting costs. So it took a look at Google Apps, wondering if it could meet the needs of a global, multilingual workforce as a replacement for the company's on premise Microsoft Exchange 2003 system. After careful due diligence and a measured proof of concept phase, the team recently completed a phased migration for 15,000 email users and charted a new course for delivering IT value.
-
High-performance Parallel Database Processing and Grid Databases
-
Macbook All-In-One for Dummies®
-
Mastering Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server
-
WileyPlus High School Stand-alone to Accompany Microsoft Office 2007 with Student CD-ROM and Six -Month Office Trial CD-ROM
-
IPod & iTunes Portable Genius
-
Quicken 2010 for Dummies®
-
Mark Minasi's Guide to Windows 7 Administration
-
IPhoto '09 for Dummies®
-
Information Technology for Management











Comments
Post new comment