Report Finds Reliability in URL Shorteners
- 20 August, 2009 07:02
On Twitter, URL shorteners have become vastly important. With the 140 character constraints for each tweet, we wouldn't have the freedom to share a link and explain its significance without them. It turns out, not URL shorteners are created equal, either.
A new report from Pingdom assessed the nine most popular URL shorteners on the Web. These services exist as their own websites where you can shorten a URL manually (such as TinyURL), or are embedded in other applications, like TweetDeck. Overall, Pingdom crowned Bit.ly and Ow.ly as the most reliable in terms of uptime.
Ow.ly displayed an annual downtime of zero hours. Bit.ly came in second with an estimated 1.8 hours. The popular TinyURL, which was one of the first such services to hit the market, experiences about 3.5 hours manually, the report says.
CIO.com looked at Bit.ly with particular interest; the majority of our tweeted links on @cioonline use the service to make sure our readers connect with our new stories as the post to the Twitter stream. We were pleased to hear that the service's "99.98% uptime is the equivalent of failing once for every 5,000 click."
Some argue much is at stake as it concerns short URLs, and I tend to agree. For one, we have become reliant on them to communicate on Twitter. If they flake out, it's possible people could miss some valuable information. Secondly, they serve as a catalyst for spam, since we can't see what's behind the link before we click on it (without a cumbersome "preview" process, which most people don't use). One critic, Joshua Schachter, contends that all the re-directions caused by these services will make our experience on the Web more sluggish. As a result, we might need to develop a streamlined way to cope with the problem.
These services also serve more purposes than shortening links, however. Many tout analytics tools that allow you to measure how many people click on the link - a helpful feature for marketers and media people.
The stability of these companies will matter a great deal moving forward. If one of them goes out of business tomorrow and people searched for the links it shortened on Twitter, that could be a big problem. We'll be watching these services as they try to build sustainable business models. Or for better solutions altogether.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Twitter Tips: URL Shorteners Do More Than Save Space - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership
- URL shortener speed and reliability shootout : Royal Pingdom
- TinyURL.com - shorten that long URL into a tiny URL
- bit.ly, a simple url shortener
- Ow.ly URL Shortener - Shrink URLs and get statistics - Owly
- Are URL Shorteners A Necessary Evil, Or Just Evil?
- joshua's blog: on url shorteners
- C.G. Lynch - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership
Why change management doesn’t work
Larry Page wants to see your medical records
Dual-Persona Smartphones Not a BYOD Panacea
After two-year hiatus, EFF accepts bitcoin donations again
CIOs struggle to deliver timely mobile business apps: survey
Moving to a Private Cloud? Infrastructure Really Matters!
The Cloud isn’t about locality. It is about quality of service delivery, cost, and whether the services consumed satisfy our objectives. For the enterprise, you need to select the right QoS to mitigate the inherent risks or you face the problem of losing data and the ability to execute operationally. Read on.
Unleashing the Power of Information
If business-relevant information is not well managed, secured and analysed, it can become an underutilized asset or—worst case—a legal and competitive liability. Nearly all of the IT and business executives who responded to a recent survey recognise this risk, and say they understand the importance of having an enterprise information management (EIM) strategy. Find out more on how to reduce costs, improve competitiveness and avoid risk by making information management an enterprisewide strategic priority.
New Demands for Real-time Threat Management
Many organisations are evaluating a new security model based upon IT risk management best practices. This is a good idea, but not enough for today’s dynamic and malevolent threat landscape. To keep up with IT changes and external threats, large organisations need to embrace two new security practices: real-time risk management for day-to-day security adjustments and real-time threat management to detect and remediate sophisticated, stealthy, and damaging security breaches (i.e., advanced persistent threats, or APTs). Learn more.