Microsoft, Linux join forces in software law debate
- 19 May, 2009 04:52
- Comments
In an unusual twist, Microsoft and Linux have joined forces in a legal tussle.
The companies jointly sent a letter expressing their common disagreement with advice regarding software law that a group plans to send to judges.
The American Law Institute (ALI), an association that develops documents meant to help guide judges as they make decisions on complicated legal subjects, is presenting a final draft of its guidelines for software contracts on Tuesday during its annual meeting. The document has been in the works since 2004 and if it is approved it will be published.
Despite the differences that most often divide Microsoft, which relies on proprietary software sales for its lifeblood, and the Linux Foundation, which promotes open-source software, the two agree in this situation.
They urge the ALI specifically to clarify a section of its document that concerns warranties on defects in software. The document appears to absolve commercial open-source software from the types of warranties that would be applied to proprietary software.
But because many open-source software providers make money, such as through advertising, it's unclear if such providers would be liable for defects according to the document.
"The principles outlined by the ALI interfere with the natural operation of open source licenses and commercial licenses as well by creating implied warranties that could result in a tremendous amount of unnecessary litigation, which would undermine the sharing of technology," Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Linux Foundation, wrote in a blog post about the letter.
Microsoft and the Linux Foundation are writing and publishing the letter because it is essentially the only way for them to express their opinions about the ALI document. Only ALI members can participate in the process of drafting such documents and there is no public review prior to publication, Zemlin said.
The draft of the document is available for download for US$45.
Microsoft and the Linux Foundation are asking the ALI to delay adoption of the principles to allow more time for input from interested parties.
They both recognize how unusual it is to be on the same side of such a debate.
"The mere fact that the Linux Foundation and Microsoft are joining forces may be viewed by some as remarkable," wrote Horacio Gutierrez, deputy general counsel for Microsoft in a blog post.
"But there is a wide range of issues that affect all software developers alike."
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
The 30 best Safari extensions -- so far
-
Apple and Google disagree over licensing of essential patents
-
Monash Uni reduces IT teams after consolidation project
-
FTC warns makers of background checking apps
-
QLD govt demands answers after pay glitch
-
Unified & Collaborative Communications
The demands on day-to-day business activities are changing all the time with the wide variety of communications media now available being a major contributing factor. They also serve to cut response times, thereby speeding up processes. With employees often working across many different sites being able to control their availability, enables new opportunities for working more efficiently. -
Introduction to Storage Security
Many organisations face the challenge of implementing protection and data security measures to meet a wide range of requirements that lie beyond regulatory compliance. This whitepaper highlights the basics of identifying key business drivers for data security, describes threats and attacks, summarizes security concepts and relationships, and then describes what constitutes storage security. -
Three simple steps to better patch security
It’s estimated that 90% of successful attacks against software vulnerabilities could be prevented with an existing patch or configuration setting. Yet patching is a persistent challenge for IT managers. With the glut of patches released each year, how do you know which ones are truly critical security patches and which ones aren’t? And how can you identify which computers are actually missing the patches they need? This paper details a simple approach to patching that gives you better visibility into and control over patch assessment and compliance.
-
Mental Ray for Maya, 3Ds Max and Xsi
-
Java Me on Symbian OS - Inside the Smartphone Model
-
Smashing CSS - Professional Techniques for Modern Layout
-
System Anaisys and Design 2E Casebook CD
-
Mark Minasi's Guide to Windows 7 Administration
-
PHP & MySQL Web Development All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies
-
Mastering Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server
-
Linux Bible 2009 Edition
-
Performance Marketing with Google Analytics











Comments
Post new comment