Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

It's Time to Stop This Madness! Part Three

It's time to stop assuming that the big project delivery consultancies actually do it better. They don’t. Relying on a big consultancy to realise the value, as company after company can attest, is madness.
Page:

In an attempt to reduce their risk, many organisations are relying on major consultancies, systems implementers or software companies to manage their projects to success. This is a high-risk approach.

Here are two examples that show that major ‘implementation’ firms have no better success rate than any average organisation to project delivery. (They just make more money out of it!)

Example 1: A major utility, fed up with its repeated failure to deliver projects successfully, decided to outsource much of project delivery to one of the major consultancies.

However, a review of how this relationship was operating found that a conservative estimate of the resultant wasted money from the new arrangements was about $42 million per annum.

What went wrong?

Firstly, the utility did not fix its project prioritisation processes — so many of the projects getting going and clocking up consultancy fees should not have got past first base. An analysis of just a sample of projects found that just over 50 percent could not justify their existence.

Secondly, the utility did not standardise or control its work request process — so anyone could request work from the consultancy, which often had a flag-fall of $70,000 just to look at it! The introduction of some primitive controls on who could request work and how, immediately started to reduce the $42 million wasted expenditure.

Thirdly, when exploring the other side, the level of consultant competence was seriously lacking. Having a 10-year contract in place, the consultancy outsourcer had reduced the quality of staff allocated to the client substantially and so their staff were certainly no better than the staff the client had had before outsourcing. Their poor quality was reducing productivity but not the charge-out cost. So, the utility was paying more because of the incompetence of the consultants!

This level of incompetence was illustrated by the consultancy turning up 3 days from the implementation of a major installation and informing the client for the first time that the solution did not work, and they did not know how to make it work!

Just one consultancy, one client, an aberration? NO!

Example 2: Let’s look at a services organisation who decided to work closely with another big consultancy — this time locking them into penalties and rewards based on their projects’ performance. They had ‘skin in the game’. All this did was pervert the consultancy’s thinking and areas of focus.

Page:

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: jed simms, project management
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Optimizing Storage and Protecting Data with Oracle Database 11g
    This paper focuses on key Oracle Database 11g capabilities that help IT departments better optimise their storage infrastructure, enabling administrators to deliver a cost-effective, scalable data management platform that is easy to manage, reduces costs, and protects data while continuing to deliver the performance and availability that today’s businesses require.
    Learn more »
  • Optimised Data Protection for VMware® Environments with Symantec NetBackup™ Appliances
    VMware® remains the most widely deployed virtualisation solution. The explosive growth of VMware infrastructure in organisations both large and small has enabled corporations to more fully exploit their hardware investments. With multiple virtual machines running on few physical hardware nodes, hardware costs are reduced, as well as space, power, and cooling requirements. This white paper discusses in more detail how VMware environments can be protected with the NetBackup appliances. Read more.
    Learn more »
  • Look both ways - Protecting your data with content inspection
    Today’s threat environment is as dynamic as the business world in which we operate. As the communications channels we use continue to proliferate and evolve, so too have the vulnerabilities. Finding the right balance between ensuring the security of sensitive data, enabling the free flow of information and making full use of the latest web-based technologies can be a challenge. Deep content inspection is a vital layer in any unified information security strategy, helping organisations to take control over their information assets while proactively protecting against malware and data leakage. Read on.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments