What Should You Expect From Your Project’s Steering Committee? Action
- 07 October, 2008 12:27
- Comments
Although few Steering Committees realise this but they’re actually there as a resource for you. They are there to ‘steer’ the project successfully into the business.
They run the business, you don’t. They can direct, control and manage the required changes in the business, you can only define, plan and support them.
If the business isn’t ready for the project (and you’ve done your part) then the steering committee has failed.
What you want is for them to be looking to see what has to done for your project to succeed, what obstacles exist that have to be removed, what other business or external events need to be taken into account and managed to ensure success.
You don’t just want them to turn up once a month to have a few pot shots at you!
Most steering committees think they’re there to ‘control the project’. Indeed, the recent use of the title Project Control Boards for steering committees, demonstrates a lack of understanding as to the steering committee’s role.
Yes, there is an element of ‘project control’, and yes, there is an element of board-like governance (are you complying with the necessary standards and policies?), but these are the lower value aspects of their role.
Where the steering committee adds value is by clearing the path for the project. This requires taking action.
As I said earlier, most steering committees don’t realise this is their role and are not prepared to adopt it, until enlightened (and, often, pushed).
A good exercise to do with your steering committee to make them aware of their role is, once the project is underway, to ask them to list “What could prevent this project from being successful?” Be sure to point their thinking towards the readiness of the organisation rather than just the project.
What you should get is a list of potential issues, some at least which will be outside the project’s control.
Ask them to categorise these issues’ likelihood and impact on the project.
Take all of the likely non-project controlled issues and tell them, “These are yours to manage. You’ve identified them as threats to your project’s success; these are not matters I can manage, so you need to take accountability and action them.”
Be prepared to help then think through and plan how to take appropriate action, but also take the opportunity to re-emphasise their essential active role.
If your steering committee refuses to acknowledge their active role, either directly or through not taking action, be sure to document and get their agreement as to what you are accountable for delivering and not delivering.
You can’t make them accountable and take action, In the worst case, you can only try to protect your reputation. This requires action on your part!
For further information and assistance on how to get your Sponsor to own their project see the governance materials at valuedeliverymanagement.com.
Click here for the first article in this the series "What Should You Expect From Your Project Sponsor? Ownership ".
Jed Simms is CIO magazine's weekly project management columnist. Simms, founder of projects and benefits delivery research firm Capability Management, is also the developer of specialised project management and project governance Web site www.project-sponsor.com
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
All Systems Down
-
NBN to deliver disability support services to regional Australia
-
Beware of malicious QR codes: Report
-
Should you consider a generic top level domain?
-
Wednesday Grok: SOPA opponents crank up The Angry
-
Best practices for a Data Warehouse on Oracle Database 11g
Increasingly companies are recognizing the value of an enterprise data warehouse (EDW). A true EDW provides a single 360-degree view of the business and a powerful platform for a wide spectrum of business intelligence tasks ranging from predictive analysis to near real-time strategic and tactical decision support throughout the organization. Read on. -
Government Communications 2.0
The problem with data is that it’s only useful if you share and use it. Equally, the more data we share electronically, the greater the risk of it falling into the wrong hands. Public sector organisations can’t function without legitimately gathering and using personal information about the citizens they are mandated to serve. Technology has made a significant contribution to that process, but has also brought new risks. Read on. -
A buyer’s guide to application lifecycle management (ALM) solutions
This buyer's guide describes the key criteria for application lifecycle management (ALM) solutions for today's high-performance teams. It includes key considerations for enhancing your single- or multi-vendor ALM environment.
-
Software Engineering, Volume 1
-
Professional ASP.NET 2.0 Security, Membership, and Role Management
-
HTML Complete, Third Edition
-
Windows Server 2008 for Dummies
-
FrontPage 2000 for Dummies
-
AutoCAD 2009 & AutoCAD LT 2009 Bible
-
EBay Timesaving Techniques for Dummies
-
E-business
-
PCs All-In-One Desk Reference for Dummies, 4th Edition









Comments
Post new comment