Although the Internet is global, and you may do business with people anywhere in the world, most people tend to look for people-networks close to home. Or do they? Should they? If the point of social networking is to connect with other people, ought it to matter where we are?
I once worked with a lovely single woman who was looking for Mr. Right. One Monday morning, she told me a story about a gentleman she met over the weekend. He was smart, kind and shared her interests. She added sadly, "Too bad it won't work out. We're geographically incompatible. I live in Peoria [a northwest Phoenix suburb] and he's in Chandler [in the southeast part of town]."
At the time, it reminded me of the old joke, in which a young swain writes a letter to his ladylove (obviously it's old; one wrote letters):
Mary—For the chance to gaze into your eyes, I would swim the deepest river. To touch your cheek, I would cross the widest desert. For the tiniest chance to kiss your perfect lips, I would climb the highest mountain.—John.
P.S. I'll come over to your house on Saturday night, if it doesn't rain.
The nice thing about Life Online is that geography doesn't have to matter. My brother-in-law didn't wonder about whether he was geographically compatible with his own ladylove; he met her through eHarmony, corresponded with her using instant messaging, talked on the phone a few times... and then drove 300 miles from Wyoming to Nebraska to meet her. Three months later, they got married. (That's your cue to say, "Awwww!" Especially since they're still married, three years later, and for good reason; my sister-in-law is wonderful.)
That's at a personal level, though. What about business? Should location be a key factor in acquiring business expertise?
Twitter's @anywhere could ushe ...
"Many South by Southwest attendees reportedly walked out halfway through the keynote appearance ..."
Google to simplify Exchange to ...
"Google has created a free tool to simplify and automate the migration of e-mail, calendar and c ..."
Law enforcement push for stric ...
"Law enforcement officials in the U.K. and U.S. are pushing the Internet Corporation for Assigne ..."
Home grown eMed app gets Web 2 ...
"The University of NSW Faculty of Medicine has developed an in-house student management system, ..."
Twitter to simplify integratio ...
"Twitter plans to launch a new platform that lets Web publishers display 'tweets' on their sites ..."
"<A HREF="http://www.arashaliyikama.com" REL="nofollow" TITLE="halı yıkama ..."
hali yikama
"Thank you so much!! I have just discovered this wonderful artist and his wo ..."
beach tanning
"Here the discussion it the true condition of the IT professionals the effec ..."
alexinarogger
"Twitter is definitely a great tool, but they are not doing enough to make i ..."
Josh
"Good to see Geelong Hospital using video for interpreter services and for ..."
Claire Larsen
I'm probably not the right person to answer the question authoritatively. A side effect of my living inside Internet packets rather than in a physical community—I don't know my next-door-neighbor's name—is that I pay little attention to where someone is. I've been a full time telecommuter for most of my career (which explains why I've written so many articles on how to do telecommuting right). I don't care about someone's geography; I only care how good they are.
Which is a lot of throat clearing for the item that inspired me today: a press release from the UK-based TalkBizNow, which aims to take on LinkedIn.
While the press release touted the TalkBiz feature set—which seems perfectly nice—that's not what their announcement made me contemplate. Instead, I thought about choices of business social networks made by people in different locales. If we're all in one big happy online world, where you can find a brilliant programmer in Poland, do we need an "American" LinkedIn and a "European" one? Is that reasonable—since we do tend to network with the people we know—or a not-so-hot sign, since we're all supposed to be moving towards a global economy?
Note that I'm not speaking here of largely personal social networks, such as Facebook, even though some of them are expanding into business. Nor am I addressing how Gen-X or Gen-Y users employ those networks. Or even the issue of the problems of relative intimacy of social network connections. And certainly not those which are serve local "where's a nearby Thai restaurant?" needs, such as Yelp or BooRah. I'm looking just at business-centric social networks.
I knew that some business social networks, like Xing, are far more popular in Europe than they are in the US, and vice versa. But if we're one world and using one Internet... well duh, does that make sense?
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services. CIO2CIO Research Study | State of the Market: Application Performance Management
Database Management | A Computerworld Strategy Guide
Computerworld Strategy Guide: Business Intelligence
Cloud Computing: Tips on differing models, best use, and easy adoption
Forrester Research Paper | Server Virtualisation Security: 90% Process, 10% Technology
Compliance Insight | Challenges and Opportunities of PCI
Green IT | Saving Money while Saving Energy: Moving Beyond the Hype to Build a Powerful Business Case for Power Management
Business Continuity: A Guide to Choosing the Right Technology Solution
Zones provide focussed content from CIO and leading technology partners.





















Comments
Post new comment