Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Tight Budgets? Try Open-Source SOA!

Implementing SOA can be an extremely expensive undertaking. You might need to purchase several products within the SOA stack like an enterprise service bus (ESB), a business process modeling (BPM) tool, a portal, a rules engine and a data services tool. But it doesn't stop there. There are additional tools for testing, SOA governance, security... and the list goes on and on. In addition to all the software, you need to budget for training, hardware, consulting and salaries.

That's a boat load of capital you need to ask senior management for. Leveraging open source products and services can help ease the pain.

There are many advantages of leveraging open source to meet your SOA needs.

1. Try before you buy. With commercial software, once you invest in the software, the cost of the software and the first year of maintenance (typically 20 per cent of the purchase price) is committed. With open source, you can create prototypes and try out the software before you commit large sums of money. Even if you plan on buying commercial software you can leverage open source software to validate your architecture before making any purchases.

2. Lower cost of entry. The cost of the various tools within the stack can be quite staggering. Open source eliminates or greatly reduces the initial sticker shock. You get the software for free and you have the option to subscribe for support services. Of course, not paying for support for your SOA stack is suicide. In some cases, there is a community version and an enterprise version. For certain products within the stack, a company may only need the community version which is totally free. Other companies may need the robust feature set of the enterprise version, but it is still substantially cheaper then commercial software.

3. Cost effective support. With commercial software, support costs a percentage of the initial purchase. This leads to incredibly high maintenance costs in the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. Support for open source software is substantially less. So not only do you not have the huge initial investment, but your ongoing fixed costs are substantially less as well.

4. Core competency. Many of the mega vendors in the SOA space have tentacles in various areas of technology with SOA being one of them. They often take existing products and tweak them in the name of SOA. They also buy several companies and then call themselves an integrated stack. The reality is, their stacks are a hodgepodge of many different companies and the promise of integration is not a reality. With many of the open-source vendors, SOA is all that they do. These products are built for SOA from the ground up, not from mergers, acquisitions, and rushed integration releases.

5. For the people by the people. Commercial software is closed and not accessible by developers. In my past life, we had some integration challenges with a vendor's portal and BPM products. We spent two months providing the vendor with logs and various information so that they could troubleshoot the issues. Once they finally found the bugs, they patched some of them but deferred others to a future release to be determined. If we had access to the code, we would have found the issues sooner and fixed the ones that they were not willing to fix in order to save the precious time that we lost while waiting for the vendor to resolve its issues. Instead, the project slipped several weeks and we wrote a ton of workarounds that will probably exist in the system for years to come.

There are a few paths that you can take for your open-source SOA initiative. You can go with a complete open-source SOA stack, you can mix and match various open-source SOA products from different vendors, or you can mix and match both commercial and open-source products.

There are two major open source stack providers that stand out: MuleSource and WSO2.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Apache, Galaxy, H&R Block, JBoss, Perficient, Promise
References show all

Comments

1

neville bradbury

Sat 21/03/2009 - 08:37

Enterprise solutions using open source

The ability to fully integrate some of the best commercial open source platforms such as Liferay, Intalio and Mule that deliver real world solutions to even the largest companies around the Global, illustrate the value of these platforms against other well entrenched cots platforms.
OpenSoft sees the changing economic times as a value add for many Enterprise and SME business real value for money. These platforms compete head to head with the key known players and OpenSoft is looking to see growth in these platforms 2009-2010.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • The Pathways ICT Leadership Development Program Brochure and Curriculum 2012
    Developed by the CIO executive Council, Pathways is a unique, flexible, self-managed, self-paced 12-month CIO designed and delivered professional development program that brings together best practices, thought leadership and business insights for today’s most promising ICT professionals.
    Learn more »
  • Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Disk-Based Backup/Recovery
    While backup is among the oldest, most performed tasks in the data center, the industry is undergoing significant change as organisations accelerate new technology adoption and show a propensity to implement new solutions, in some cases from vendors that are emerging or new to the backup market.
    Learn more »
  • Three simple steps to better patch security
    It’s estimated that 90% of successful attacks against software vulnerabilities could be prevented with an existing patch or configuration setting. Yet patching is a persistent challenge for IT managers. With the glut of patches released each year, how do you know which ones are truly critical security patches and which ones aren’t? And how can you identify which computers are actually missing the patches they need? This paper details a simple approach to patching that gives you better visibility into and control over patch assessment and compliance.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.