Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part 5: Value-based Project Planning

Projects alone rarely deliver the business value expected, and there’s a very good reason for this

When 'value delivery management' is considered the central focus of your project, it changes the whole project.

Because some of the standard project methodologies don't even mention 'value', it is considered something that happens outside the project, after the project has finished, 'somewhere in the business'.

Because of this, most project plans are not focused on value delivery but on project output delivery (in the hope and expectation that these outputs will deliver the expected value).

This leads to one of the great disconnects with projects.

  • The project team focuses on its outputs and largely ignores the value.
  • The business team expects the project outputs to deliver the value.
Sorry folks, but projects alone rarely deliver the business value expected, and there's a very good reason for this.

The realization of value requires a change from the current business state to a new business state. Just putting in a new computer system, for example, does not do this — it may deliver some value (measured at around 20-25% of the potential total), but the majority of the value is realized through organizational change and commitment.

Only the business manages the organization. Only the business can change the organization. Therefore, it is only the business that can realize the benefits and associated value.

Now, before project managers sign off from any focus on value again, a few things need to be cleared up.

  1. Value is derived from the delivery of measurable business end states (what we call, 'desired business outcomes').


  2. The primary task of all projects is to define these desired business outcomes and plan all of the activities required to deliver them. This is a joint accountability of the project, governance team and business.


  3. The project alone will not usually deliver all of these desired business outcomes in full, but should be planned to deliver a sub-set that enables or supports the subsequent delivery of the full business outcomes and their associated value.


  4. The project team (in conjunction with the business) is also accountable for planning the additional non-project team delivered work required to move the organization from the project-delivered outputs to the desired business end states with their benefits and value.

This value-focused planning approach ensures:
  • The project outcomes are measurable.
  • The gap between them and the desired business outcomes is known.
  • The workload required to realize the benefits and value is planned from the outset.
With this value-focused project planning process you'll end up with:
  • Activities enacted totally within the project (Project delivery plans).
  • Activities enacted by both the project team and the business (Project and Benefits delivery plans).
  • Activities enacted totally within the business with no project team involvement (eg. post project benefits delivery plans).

This value-planning approach securely 'locks' the business into both the project and the delivery of its (and their own) outcomes and value.

Comment on our blog at valuedeliverymanagement.com




Click here for the fourth article in this the series "Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part 4: Redefining 'Success'".

Click here for the first article in this the series "Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part I: The Need".

Jed Simms is CIO magazine's weekly project management columnist. Simms, founder of projects and benefits delivery research firm Capability Management, is also the developer of specialized project management and project governance Web site www.project-sponsor.com

.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: SIMMS, Simms International
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Business Process Platforms 2011 Vendor Analysis
    Enterprises adopting business process management (BPM) software have wide-ranging needs, from highly dynamic task management to complex, high-volume processing with a focus on straight-through automation and the ability to rapidly detect exceptions. This IDC MarketScape focuses on what we call business process (BP) platforms, which are optimized to support midrange to more complex use cases. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • Pathways Advanced ICT Leadership Development Program Brochure and Course Outline 2012
    Developed by the CIO executive Council in conjunction with Rob Livingstone Advisory, Pathways Advanced is a 12-month CIO delivered, small group, mentor based professional leadership development program. Pathways Advanced brings together best practice, thought leadership and business insights for today’s most promising ICT professionals
    Learn more »
  • Leveraging the Service Catalog to Scale Your MSP Business
    When assessing an MSP’s maturity and prospects, one question provides more insights than any other: “What’s in your service catalog?” A well-defined service catalog can set the framework for growth. The lack of a service catalog can significantly impede an MSP’s ability to scale. This paper explores why the service catalog is so vital, and provides some practical guidelines MSPs can apply in order to ensure their service catalog provides maximum utility and benefit.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments