Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part 5: Value-based Project Planning
- 03 June, 2008 10:53
- Comments
When 'value delivery management' is considered the central focus of your project, it changes the whole project.
Because some of the standard project methodologies don't even mention 'value', it is considered something that happens outside the project, after the project has finished, 'somewhere in the business'.
Because of this, most project plans are not focused on value delivery but on project output delivery (in the hope and expectation that these outputs will deliver the expected value).
This leads to one of the great disconnects with projects.
- The project team focuses on its outputs and largely ignores the value.
- The business team expects the project outputs to deliver the value.
The realization of value requires a change from the current business state to a new business state. Just putting in a new computer system, for example, does not do this — it may deliver some value (measured at around 20-25% of the potential total), but the majority of the value is realized through organizational change and commitment.
Only the business manages the organization. Only the business can change the organization. Therefore, it is only the business that can realize the benefits and associated value.
Now, before project managers sign off from any focus on value again, a few things need to be cleared up.
- Value is derived from the delivery of measurable business end states (what we call, 'desired business outcomes').
- The primary task of all projects is to define these desired business outcomes and plan all of the activities required to deliver them. This is a joint accountability of the project, governance team and business.
- The project alone will not usually deliver all of these desired business outcomes in full, but should be planned to deliver a sub-set that enables or supports the subsequent delivery of the full business outcomes and their associated value.
- The project team (in conjunction with the business) is also accountable for planning the additional non-project team delivered work required to move the organization from the project-delivered outputs to the desired business end states with their benefits and value.
This value-focused planning approach ensures:
- The project outcomes are measurable.
- The gap between them and the desired business outcomes is known.
- The workload required to realize the benefits and value is planned from the outset.
- Activities enacted totally within the project (Project delivery plans).
- Activities enacted by both the project team and the business (Project and Benefits delivery plans).
- Activities enacted totally within the business with no project team involvement (eg. post project benefits delivery plans).
This value-planning approach securely 'locks' the business into both the project and the delivery of its (and their own) outcomes and value.
Comment on our blog at valuedeliverymanagement.com
Click here for the fourth article in this the series "Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part 4: Redefining 'Success'".
Click here for the first article in this the series "Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part I: The Need".
Jed Simms is CIO magazine's weekly project management columnist. Simms, founder of projects and benefits delivery research firm Capability Management, is also the developer of specialized project management and project governance Web site www.project-sponsor.com
.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
Australia's first 4G smartphone is the HTC Velocity 4G
-
Swedish e-commerce startup's execs linked to NYC sex crime
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
How to implement next-generation storage infrastructure for Big Data
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Business Process Platforms 2011 Vendor Analysis
Enterprises adopting business process management (BPM) software have wide-ranging needs, from highly dynamic task management to complex, high-volume processing with a focus on straight-through automation and the ability to rapidly detect exceptions. This IDC MarketScape focuses on what we call business process (BP) platforms, which are optimized to support midrange to more complex use cases. Read on. -
Pathways Advanced ICT Leadership Development Program Brochure and Course Outline 2012
Developed by the CIO executive Council in conjunction with Rob Livingstone Advisory, Pathways Advanced is a 12-month CIO delivered, small group, mentor based professional leadership development program. Pathways Advanced brings together best practice, thought leadership and business insights for today’s most promising ICT professionals -
Leveraging the Service Catalog to Scale Your MSP Business
When assessing an MSP’s maturity and prospects, one question provides more insights than any other: “What’s in your service catalog?” A well-defined service catalog can set the framework for growth. The lack of a service catalog can significantly impede an MSP’s ability to scale. This paper explores why the service catalog is so vital, and provides some practical guidelines MSPs can apply in order to ensure their service catalog provides maximum utility and benefit.
-
The Game Animator's Guide to Maya (Includes Cd-ro M)
-
File Organization and Processing
-
Upgrading & Fixing Laptops for Dummies
-
Windows Server 2008 R2 Administration Instant Reference
-
Upgrading Your Home PC
-
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2002 - Sybex Official Strategies & Secrets
-
XML Web Services for ASP.NET
-
Windows Server 2008 Implementation and Administration
-
Mac OS X Leopard Portable Genius








Comments
Post new comment