Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part 4: Redefining 'Success'

Let’s start at with the absolute basic question — why do we do projects?

"We did well," an executive once said to me, "we came in only 70 percent over budget!"

But did he do better than another Sponsor who drove his project to come in on time and budget by reducing the scope until his project's potential realizable value had almost disappeared?

Executives are often bemused when I ask them why their projects exist, what their 'standard' for success is, and which measures of success they actually measure. They don't know the answers, because they've never even thought of the questions.

Let's start at the beginning with the absolute basic question — why do we do projects?

We do projects to move from where we are to a new state that we believe will deliver greater value than if we did nothing.

This 'value' may be financial, greater flexibility, increased compliance, reduced errors, or whatever.

This value, however, is not a 'hoped for' aftermath of the project, but the whole reason for the project.

"Value delivery" is what projects are all about.

The most common measure of success is "the successful delivery of the project on time, on budget, to specification". But is that right? Does this measure actually deliver the value? Value delivery management research shows that the answer is "No". There are three valid measures of success — project, governance and business — and their all interrelated and equally valid.

Project success can include the successful implementation of a solution, governance success can include realization of the business outcomes, and business success can include a smooth transition and staff satisfaction with the outcomes.

All of these measures must be known, acknowledged, and focused on. Only achievement of all three sets of success measures constitutes full "success" and value.

Conventional approaches to project delivery don't identify these three sets of measures, so value delivery management requires organizations to implement or upgrade their 'Project Success Definition and Measurement' processes in such a way as to identify, plan, and deliver all three sets of success measures.

Then, every dimension of your project should be refocused onto delivering this value.



Comment on our blog at valuedeliverymanagement.com




Click here for the third article in this the series "Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part 3: Defining Your Business Outcomes".

Click here for the first article in this the series "Refocusing Projects onto Business Value, Part I: The Need".

Jed Simms is CIO magazine's weekly project management columnist. Simms, founder of projects and benefits delivery research firm Capability Management, is also the developer of specialized project management and project governance Web site www.project-sponsor.com

.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: SIMMS, Simms International
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Oracle IT Modernization Series Modernization: The Path to SOA
    More and more organizations are looking to service-oriented architecture (SOA) as the basis of their future computer architecture. Recognizing that legacy application design and implementation approaches have led to applications that are costly to operate and maintain, hard to change, and rely on a dwindling set of skills, organizations are hoping that SOA provides a key component of the answer to these problems. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • A buyer’s guide to application lifecycle management (ALM) solutions
    This buyer's guide describes the key criteria for application lifecycle management (ALM) solutions for today's high-performance teams. It includes key considerations for enhancing your single- or multi-vendor ALM environment.
    Learn more »
  • OVUM Report: Governance Risk and Compliance-- GRC usage and buying trends in the ANZ markets
    The existence of an established and stable governance risk and compliance strategy is extremely important to public and private sector organisations as they strive to meet an evergrowing range of regulatory demands. Given the current constraints, it is one of the few areas where the vast majority of organisations intend to either maintain or in many cases increase spending. Read more.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments