The Manhattan Effect
- 06 March, 2007 12:27
- Comments
I've been lucky enough to live, work and hang out in both Manhattans — as in New York and Kansas — which makes me kind of an expert on how you can tell the difference between the two. For instance, while you might not be surprised to learn that the restaurants in Manhattan, New York, are better than the restaurants in Manhattan, Kansas, the disparity between the two is probably bigger and perhaps more mysterious than you think.
It's not an exaggeration to say that the 10 highest ranked restaurants in Manhattan, Kansas, are not as good as the 10 lowest ranked in Manhattan, New York. To the casual observer, there might be a few seemingly obvious reasons why this is so, such as concentration of wealth or concentration and diversity of population. But Manhattan, Kansas, has some advantages too, like proximity to (hence freshness of) the ingredients as well as fewer distractions. But that's not the important distinction. The fact is that the differences are actually caused by bad attitudes and a general lack of empathy. Not by the restaurants; by the customers. And not by the customers in New York; by the customers in Kansas.
I'm terrible at small talk and as awkward as Joe Cocker in a conga line when I have to walk into a room full of strangers. I'm always glad to attend CIO conferences, but I'm only good for about 15 minutes at those "networking" receptions sponsored by this or that vendor. My coping mechanism is to enter the room, move slowly into a circle of people and pretend to listen. Most of what you hear among any circle of strangers as they carefully sail clear of the "never talk about" topics like politics, religion, race, gender, social issues and, of course, Fight Club, is an amazing amount of chatter with very little usable information or ideas being exchanged. This isn't because there aren't great ideas or powerful intellects present, but because you never know, in a situation like this, whom you might offend by offering an opinion. Sadly, many are cowed by the threat of disapproval for expressing even the most traditional point of view. What results is conversational chloroform.
Examples of pure and unambiguous communication can be hard to find, but it happens occasionally. For instance, there are our horses. We love our horses here on the ranch in Texas, but we'd be the first ones to admit that they're pretty dumb. For the most part, horses have one thing going through their little minds, 24 hours a day, and it explains a lot about their sometimes strange behaviour.
It is: "I'm a horse, I taste good."
I don't know what they're so afraid of. We're not French!
Horses are absolute geniuses about one thing, though. That is, the specific location and placement of their feet. It's what allows them to navigate rough, vertical terrain at breakneck speeds or walk carefully around a newborn foal in a tiny birthing stall.
So, it is absolutely, 100 percent true that if a horse steps on your foot, it is because he meant to. The horse is attempting to communicate. This is attitude as a figure of speech, and if you don't understand the message, you might be in for a very bad day. What he's asking is: "Who's going to be in charge today? Who gets to crowd whom, and which one of us is going to step aside?" These are questions that horses ask of each other every morning as they're turned out in a pasture. Most of our horses weigh between 450 and 550 kilograms. I weigh 77 kilograms. So, it's important that I make myself clear about who's in charge when I get a question like this.
But back to the Manhattan thing . . .
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
-
Australia's first 4G smartphone is the HTC Velocity 4G
-
Swedish e-commerce startup's execs linked to NYC sex crime
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
How to implement next-generation storage infrastructure for Big Data
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
Case Study: HJ Heinz
Heinz has trusted Sophos to protect its desktop users and email systems from malware and spam for many years. As part of its multi-tier approach to IT security, the company needed more robust protection against web-based threats and the use of unauthorised applications. -
Keeping up With Ever-Expanding Enterprise Data - 2010 IOUG Database Growth Survey
A majority of respondents report having performance and budget issues due to exponential data growth. Those companies with the highest rates of data growth, in fact, are eight times more likely than slow-growth sites to be seeing significant increases in their storage budgets. New processes and tools are needed to help organizations take control of the massive volumes of information now moving through their systems. The IOUG survey looked at approaches being taken by organizations to manage their growing data stores, and what still needs to be done. -
Optimizing Storage and Protecting Data with Oracle Database 11g
This paper focuses on key Oracle Database 11g capabilities that help IT departments better optimise their storage infrastructure, enabling administrators to deliver a cost-effective, scalable data management platform that is easy to manage, reduces costs, and protects data while continuing to deliver the performance and availability that today’s businesses require.
-
Software Engineering Risk Management
-
PowerPoint 2010 for Dummies®
-
System Anaisys and Design 2E Casebook CD
-
Using Aspect Oriented Programming for Trustworthy Software Development
-
Learning Autodesk Maya 8
-
Windows XP Secrets
-
Programming for the Series 60 Platform and Symbian OS - Digia Series 60
-
50 Fast Photoshop 7 Techniques (Includes CD-ROM)
-
Bittorrent for Dummies®








Comments
Post new comment