Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

The Four Stages of Enterprise Architecture

An exclusive MIT survey maps the evolution of IT architecture and explains why you can’t skip any steps

Reader ROI

  • How to lay the groundwork for service-oriented architecture
  • The impact of mergers and acquisitions
  • How architectural incrementalism works

It was 1999, and addressing any potential Y2K flaws in all of State Street's computer systems consumed the giant financial services provider's IT attention. But despite the tremendous focus on making sure that "00" would be interpreted as Y2000 rather than Y1900, David Saul, then systems software manager and Y2K remediation lead at State Street, realized something else. All the remediation projects were connected, and to ensure that any Y2K-related change in application A would not cause problems for application B, the project team needed to understand the relationships among applications and all of their inputs and outputs.

For example, State Street's applications use reference data to process security transactions (the currency, the exchange on which the trade is made and so on). Because this data is used across all applications, it made sense to Saul's team to handle it independently from the specific financial applications that drew upon it. At the time, most applications handled their own reference data, rather than relying on a separate, common service. Recognizing the value of common services, State Street formed an Office of Architecture (which Saul has headed ever since) to create the architectural environment for them. "It was a natural progression from there to delivering reference data as a service to today's service-oriented architectures," he says.

Even if an SOA is what your enterprise needs, you may not be ready to deploy one
The SOA approach aligns software and data services directly with business processes so that specific services can be reused and mixed and matched as needed. That lowers technology development costs and improves the company's ability to offer new or improved services to customers and supply chain partners.

And that's all good. But even if an SOA is what your enterprise needs, you may not be ready to deploy one. That's one conclusion from a pair of recent MIT Sloan Centre for Information Systems Research (CISR) studies, "IT Architecture as Strategy" and "IT-Driven Strategic Choices", both based on a series of research projects involving 456 enterprises between 1995 and 2006. The CISR research identified four distinct architectural stages — silos, standardized IT, standardized business processes, and business modularity — that both the business units and IT must pass through before SOA's benefits can be fully realized. And no one gets to skip any stages. At best, you can speed up the process. For the CISR researchers, this conclusion was unexpected, says Jeanne W Ross, the studies' principal research scientist. "But when we tell people that, they say: 'Oh, that's why it's not going that well'."

And because the vast majority of enterprises are in the first or second stage (and, again, they don't get to skip), it will be years, perhaps decades, before SOA is widely adopted in an effective way, Ross says.

CISR's research provides a road map for both the business and IT to follow so that they can avoid fruitless diversions, not get discouraged during the long haul and understand what success should look like when it's finally achieved. Happily, Ross notes that each stage comes with its own benefits, so there are short-term returns on the long-term architectural investment.

Each stage takes about five years to get through, says Ross, though that period could shorten as more companies go through the process and learn what missteps to avoid. "Seven years ago, there were no architectural practices at the research firms," notes State Street's Saul. Today's enterprises, he says, don't have to feel their way as much.

The good news, according to Ross, is that your competitors are likely to be at or near the same architectural maturity level as you are, and they can't leapfrog any stages either. Those that try to could waste time and effort deploying business processes and IT infrastructure that they're not ready to use.

Rather than attempting great leaps forward, Ross suggests that CIOs should partner with the rest of the business to move their enterprise forward incrementally, gaining expertise, building buy-in and reaping the ROI that will sustain long-term maturity. Having the architectural maturity framework in mind during that evolution gives CIOs and their business peers a way to evaluate if they're really progressing, she says.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: ACT, Celanese, Cemex, Delta, Delta Air Lines, Dow Chemical, ING, IT People, Leader, Leader Computers, Logical, Metlife, MIT, Optimal Solutions, PLUS, Promise, Sigma, Speed, Toyota, Unify
References show all

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Best Practices for Energy Efficient Storage Operations Version 1.0
    The energy required to support data center IT operations is becoming a central concern worldwide. For some data centers, additional energy supply is simply not available, either due to finite power generation capacity in certain regions or the inability of the power distribution grid to accommodate more lines. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • Case Study: Understand How Edith Cowan University has Regained Control of their Storage Environment
    Storage infrastructures continue to grow at alarming rates - up to 60% or more, annually. Like many organisations, Edith Cowan University was facing such rapid data growth, with its storage system capacity projected to double each year. Using IBM Tivoli storage solutions, the university has been able to reduce the number of physical disks required and make better use of their existing storage capacity, helping them to make more efficient use of the space in their data centre and reduce their spend on power and cooling. They now make space-efficient snapshots for failover and are able to recover systems in hours instead of days.
    Learn more »
  • IBM agility@scale™: Become as Agile as You Can Be
    In this eBook, Scott Ambler, IBM Rational software's Chief Methodologist for Agile and Lean discusses how IT organisations are finding that agile project teams, as compared to traditional project teams, enjoy higher success rates, deliver higher quality projects, have greater levels of stakeholder satisfaction, provide better return on investment (ROI) and deliver systems to market sooner.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments

HP and IDG news, product videos and resources