Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Blog: Should Social Networks Be Banned at Work?

A recent report by Global Secure Systems and Infosecurity Europe UK found that social networking sites like Facebook, MySpace and Bebo cost businesses as much as 6.5 billion pounds (AU$14 billion) a year in lost productivity, according to an article in the SiliconRepublic.

The report - which surveyed 776 office workers of their social networking habits - most workers claimed to have spent at least 30 minutes a day on social networks.

The SiliconRepublic article (a link to the actual report wasn't available as of yet) had these two interesting tidbits as well:

Infosecurity Europe held a meeting of 20 Chief Information Security Officers, who claimed that social networking sites on the top of their to-do lists for security and that the sites alone were eating up between 15 and 20 percent of their companies' bandwidth. One CISO even reported his company had blocked Facebook for consuming 30 percent of the company's bandwidth at work.

Claire Sellick, Infosecurity Europe's Event Director, said very bluntly: "It would appear that most CISO and IT Directors loathe social networking sites and if they had their way would ban them completely, but what is also coming across loud and clear is that the HR departments actually welcome the use of these sites - so there is a lot of internal pushing and shoving going on between HR and IT over how best to manage these sites."

Here at CIO, we've had a pretty healthy debate about the issue of Facebook within the context of the enterprise. It first started when our publisher emeritus, Gary Beach, wrote a column saying he'd shunned Facebook as an application for kids and would invite IT luminaries and CIOs to join him on LinkedIn, the social network aimed at professionals. On the other hand, our editor in chief, Abbie Lundberg, has fallen head over heels for Facebook, as evinced by her confessions of a Facebook addict.

I argued CIOs should be on Facebook and LinkedIn for both professional and personal reasons, while Senior Editor Tom Wailgum proclaimed he simply didn't have the time for Facebook altogether.

In all those accounts, however, we never directly debated the merits of banning it within corporate walls. I, for one, believe it would be a mistake. I don't accept the productivity loss argument. Every new technology is what an employee makes of it. IM is a perfect example. The employees who chat with their friends all day are inefficient, distracted workers (who, let's face it, won't last at the organization), while the employees who chat with their colleagues, business partners, customers and other contacts are probably incredibly productive.

The security question is more interesting (and valid). While there are security risks with social networks, I don't see them as being substantively different than the risks of web-browsing in general (a conclusion I came to after researching a Facebook widget that installed malware on users' computers). So unless you're willing to ban web access - and, in doing so, risk losing your best talent to competitors with more progressive usage policies - it seems counterintuitive to single out the social networks. It's the job of corporate IT departments to educate their users on what is and what isn't safe on the web. I see no reason that educational process can't be extended to social networks.

By banning social networks, companies would, in effect, discourage employees from making connections with each other, and with customers (the latter, by the way, usually leads to sources of revenue). That, to me, seems risky.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Billion, Claire

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • The eGuide to Data Movement and Governance: Helping Business Professionals Stay Up to Speed
    You fail an audit. Or customer information is compromised. Or you are called on the carpet for failing to meet a critical customer SLA. At that point you realise just how important it is to your organisation and to your career. How do you prepare for that moment? More importantly, how do you prevent it from happening in the first place? It is absolutely critical that you understand the possible consequences of a failure to properly monitor, control, and protect the movement of data. Missed opportunities and lost revenue might be the least of your worries. In some cases, poor practices can lead to lawsuits, fines, and even the failure of the business itself. The purpose of this eGuide is to help you grasp the measures that can keep your organisation on track to meet objectives and in line with regulations.
    Learn more »
  • Endpoint Buyers Guide
    It takes more than antivirus to stop today’s advanced threats. Protecting corporate assets requires a complete security solution that includes anti-malware, host-based intrusion prevention (HIPS), web protection, patch assessment, application and device control, network access control, data loss prevention, firewall and other capabilities. In short, you need an endpoint protection solution. We examine the top vendors according to market share and industry analysis: Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Sophos, Symantec and Trend Micro. Each vendor’s solutions are evaluated according to: Product features and capabilities, Effectiveness, Performance, Usability, Data protection, and Technical support.
    Learn more »
  • Two May Be Better Than One: Why Hard Disk Drives and Flash Belong Together
    This white paper will explore the need for a caching and buffering technology between DRAM and HDDs and why Flash memory can be used to fill this need. We will go on to look at various ways that Flash and HDDs can be combined in a computer storage hierarchy. These technologies to combine Flash memory and HDDs include hybrid HDDs, Flash on the computer motherboard, and a combination of Flash and HDD storage devices in the same computer – paired storage systems.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments

HP and IDG news, product videos and resources