Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

That Was the Year That Wasn't

There’s not much to see in the 2007 rear-view mirror

Since early October I've fielded at least a couple of calls a week from various PR people asking if I plan to do a year in review feature in my last issue of 2007. Even though a perverse part of me wants to ask why, I answer no and we say quick goodbyes.

I stopped entering into lengthy discussions with PRs years ago because, like salespeople and consultants in the work world and politicians and friends in your personal life, they inevitably believe they know what's better for you than you do yourself. My favourite instance was a few years back when I got a call from a PR woman, whose company I'd never heard of, who needed my delivery details so she could send me an important luxury book. I made the mistake of asking why, and while she never told me exactly what her organization did, she insisted I would understand how important the book was to my audience once I received it.

About two weeks later the luxury book arrived at the office. It was quite lovely, and it was about architecture. Go figure.

The good news was that it was big (I have a rather large coffee table in my front room and it can always use a top-up).

But back to the "year in review", or lack thereof, in this magazine. For the life of me I can't figure out why anyone in 2007 would be the least interested in a walk down memory lane. Is this not, after all, the era of multi-channel, real-time information? The Internet has made us consumers of immediacy; news is old at the 15-minute mark. Moreover, in this increasingly mature industry, what notable events are there to reminisce about? That a handful of mega IT vendors bought two handfuls of mid-size vendors? Oh yeah, and Vista was finally released.

I think the year in review mentality is one indicator of the confusion that exists in reporting on IT today. I see too many stories about music downloads, Facebook, MySpace and Second Life in IT publications. I see too many attempts to put the square peg of Web 2.0 into the round hole of enterprise IT. Almost a decade ago, the IT press put the dotcom phenomenon squarely in the court of IT and look where it got us: tarred with a brush that we never deserved.

We are flying way too close to that flame again. Go figure.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • High Availability with Oracle Database 11g Release 2
    In this paper, we review the common causes of application downtime and discuss how technologies available in the Oracle Database can help avoid costly downtime and enable rapid recovery from unplanned failures and also minimize impact from planned outages. We also highlight new technologies introduced in Oracle Database 11g Release 2 that enable businesses to make their IT infrastructure even more robust and fault tolerant, maximize their return on investment on high availability infrastructure, and provide better quality of service to users.
    Learn more »
  • Aberdeen Group Analyst Insight Report: Does Your Enterprise Have a “Dropbox Problem?”
    Without policies, education, and officially supported alternatives for sharing files securely, end-users will often overlook security in favor of getting the job done by using free, readily available alternatives. Read this Aberdeen Group report to learn how top-performing organisations support business objectives of end-users while meeting security requirements and: The "Dropbox Problem" defined; Research findings on the changing characteristics of data; Characteristics to look for when evaluating enterprise-class secure file sharing solutions.
    Learn more »
  • Oracle SOA vs. IBM SOA - Customer Perspectives on Evaluating Complexity and Business Value
    The Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) model has become the cornerstone of business computing. Its ability to greatly accelerate the development of business-critical applications promotes business agility, decreases time-to-value and total cost of ownership (TCO), and greatly increases the efficiency and strategic value of IT. SOA implementations tend to be complex, IT decision makers should carefully consider their choice of a SOA platform in terms of its ability to simplify the fundamental development, deployment, and management tasks involved. Read on.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments