Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

Ignoring the Obvious

Too many C-level executives and their direct reports don't ask the simplest, most fundamental, most essential questions about what they're trying to accomplish. It's as if the obvious is taken for granted
Page:

You have to know what questions to ask about your business before you can install a successful IT system. Just ask the FBI.

Lucky me. I received a phone call from an obscenely rich organization that genuinely believed that the best way to solve a problem was to throw a lot of money at it. They wanted "world class". And I was hired to help them get it.

The challenge? This financial services company wanted to dramatically improve the quantity and quality of collaboration within its enterprise. Top management had decided that collaboration was to be their new core competence. I was to recommend the best software, systems and apps for achieving this. No expense would be spared in procuring that technical infrastructure. A "smart" client with money to burn — what an opportunity!

I could barely keep the drool from dribbling down my chin. This would be the client that would pay for my children's Ivy League educations. And I don't even have children.

Then, I made the mistake of asking the obvious question: How does the business share information and collaborate now?

Don't really know, don't really care and doesn't really matter, said my client dismissively. You're not here to diagnose our current behaviours; you're here to help us implement our vision of the collaborative future. We need you to make sure we buy the best collaborative technologies in the world.

Of course, I could have taken both the hint and the (lots and lots of) money. Alas, I had to ask the follow up: What other C-level initiatives is the company taking to assure that this cultural transformation to collaboration will work?

The client's eyes rolled: We're signalling our commitment to collaboration by our huge investment in this world-class collaborative infrastructure. We're telling our people to collaborate. This investment removes the technical obstacles that keep them from doing so. They'll do what we want.

Not good. The client could not — would not — give real answers to obvious questions. They hadn't even thought about them. Even worse, these questions had obviously annoyed them. A lot. They now promised to get back to me. I knew they never would. And they didn't. That night, I cried myself to sleep. No Harvard, Yale or MIT for my (virtual) kids. Unlucky me.

Of course, the collaboration initiative went nowhere. Tens of millions of dollars were wasted — and none of it on me. In truth, the company possessed a spiteful, ruthlessly competitive culture that thrived on political infighting and cutting ethical corners. Management cared most passionately about the size of the annual bonus and behaved accordingly. Between the Securities and Exchange Commission's investigations and incessant executive infighting, its best clients scattered. The company was acquired within 18 months of my failed dream of consulting riches. Can you say schadenfreude?

This column is about managing the obvious. Too many C-level executives and their direct reports don't ask the simplest, most fundamental, most essential questions about what they're trying to accomplish. It's as if the obvious is taken for granted.

Page:

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: Best Software, FBI, MIT, MIT Media Lab, Science Applications International, Securities and Exchange Commission

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • SOA Best Practices and Design Patterns
    By learning from the experiences of those organisations that have been through the process and looking at the standard best practices of large‐scale technology implementations, success can come earlier and more dramatically. Read more now.
    Learn more »
  • Protecting Against the Leading Causes of Data Breach
    This whitepaper was written for the organisation that wants to focus on prevention of data loss and doesn’t have millions to spend, but needs affordable solutions that can be implemented today to protect millions of sensitive records and dollars worth of intellectual property. This whitepaper addresses: - What organisations can do to prevent the four leading causes of data breaches - Why dedicated (pure-play) DLP solutions may not protect you from all four leading causes of data breaches - How to get prevent sensitive data leaving your organisation
    Learn more »
  • Three simple steps to better patch security
    It’s estimated that 90% of successful attacks against software vulnerabilities could be prevented with an existing patch or configuration setting. Yet patching is a persistent challenge for IT managers. With the glut of patches released each year, how do you know which ones are truly critical security patches and which ones aren’t? And how can you identify which computers are actually missing the patches they need? This paper details a simple approach to patching that gives you better visibility into and control over patch assessment and compliance.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments