Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

RTCP XR Measures VoIP Performance

VoIP quality control just got a whole lot easier.

VoIP quality control just got a whole lot easier.

Voice over IP can suffer from a variety of problems that can be challenging to detect and resolve, such as periods of degraded quality because of network congestion, and echo resulting from interconnections to other services. These issues require a new approach to fault and performance management.

A new VoIP management protocol, RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR), defines a set of metrics that contain information for assessing VoIP call quality and diagnosing problems. In November the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) published RTCP XR as RFC 3611(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3611.txt).

RTCP XR can be implemented as software integrated into IP phones and gateways inexpensively. RTCP XR messages containing key call-quality-related metrics are exchanged periodically between IP phones and gateways. This lets a probe or analyser monitor these metrics midstream to support problem resolution, or be retrieved from a gateway using SNMP .

The protocol measures VoIP call quality using these key metrics:

Packet loss and discard Packet loss and jitter affect call quality. The jitter buffer removes the jitter in the receiving IP phone or gateway, but this process adds delay and causes packets that arrive late to be discarded.

RTCP XR reports the packet loss rate, packet discard rate (because of jitter) and the distribution of lost and discarded packets. The loss/discard distribution describes the call in terms of bursts (periods during which the loss/discard rate is high enough to cause noticeable quality degradation) and gaps (periods during which lost or discarded packets occur infrequently and hence quality is generally good).

Delay Delay can make conversations difficult and make the effects of echo obvious. RTCP XR reports round-trip delay, corresponding to the packet path delay that would be measured using RTCP, and end system delay, which represents the delay that the VoIP endpoint adds (because of encoding, decoding and the jitter buffer).

Signal, noise and echo levels If a signal is too loud, too quiet or too noisy, call quality suffers. RTCP XR reports the signal and noise level associated with the received signal, making it easier to identify signal- and noise-level problems.

If the IP endpoint contains an echo canceller, RTCP XR can report the residual (uncancelled) echo level, which helps the remote IP endpoint calculate call quality more accurately and make the detection of echo problems easier.

Call quality RTCP XR can report call quality directly, in terms of estimated R factor or mean opinion score (MOS). An R factor is a conversational-quality metric in the range of 0 to 100. MOS-LQ is a listening-quality metric and MOS-CQ a conversational-quality metric, both in the range of 1 to 5. These can be generated using embedded software-agent technology.

Configuration data RTCP XR reports the jitter buffer size and configuration, and the type of packet-loss concealment algorithm in use.

Access to such performance data for each IP phone on an enterprise network makes it easier to diagnose problems remotely. Administrators can use SNMP to retrieve data from each IP gateway, or use midstream probes or analysers to capture call-quality data to aid in problem resolution. RTCP XR lets midstream probes and analysers obtain information on signal, noise and echo levels without having to decode the packet stream, which will be essential if payloads are encrypted using the new Secure RTP protocol from the IETF.

The set of VoIP performance metrics defined in RTCP XR also form the basis for new draft quality-of-service reporting extensions to leading call-control protocols. This will let IP endpoints report call-quality metrics directly to call managers and softswitches, making integration into call detail records easier.

RTCP XR will form a key part of the emerging VoIP management infrastructure. Major IP phone, gateway and VoIP test-equipment manufacturers have already begun to implement this new protocol and widespread support is expected by mid-2004.

Alan Clark is the CEO of Telchemy.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: EndPoints, Gateway, IETF, Internet Engineering Task Force

Comments

1

Chris

Fri 20/11/2009 - 05:23

IP Phones that support RTCP-XR

Can anyone tell me IP Phone vendors that support RTCP-XR? I have looked at spec sheets for the leading brands but can see nothing about it.

Thanks

2

Brian Lipp

Tue 11/05/2010 - 00:57

Polycom does I know that for a fact.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Eight threats your antivirus won’t stop - Why you need endpoint security
    News headlines are a constant reminder that malware attacks and data loss are on the rise. High-profile incidents that make big news might seem out of the ordinary. Yet businesses of every size face similar risks in the everyday acts of using digital technology and the Internet for legitimate purposes. This paper outlines eight common threats that traditional antivirus alone won’t stop, and explains how to protect your organisation using endpoint security.
    Learn more »
  • Securing SOA and Web Services with Oracle Enterprise Gateway
    Companies worldwide are actively deploying service-oriented architecture (SOA) infrastructures using web services, both in intranet and extranet environments. While web services offer many advantages over traditional alternatives (e.g., distributed objects or custom software), deploying networks of interconnected web services still presents key challenges, especially in terms of security and management.
    Learn more »
  • Get the Whole Picture Why Most Organizations Miss User Response Monitoring—and What to Do About It
    You can be armed with vast amounts of performance metrics, but if you don’t know what users are actually experiencing, you don’t have the real performance picture. While this measure is critical, it is one many organizations fail to consistently capture. This guide looks at the challenges of user response monitoring, and it shows how you can overcome these challenges and start to get a real handle on your infrastructure performance and how it impacts your users’ experience.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments