Legislators Knock DHS CIO for IT Security Weaknesses
- 25 June, 2007 14:24
- Comments
Members of a US House subcommittee blasted Department of Homeland Security CIO Scott Charbo for what they called a lack of leadership on information security issues and questioned his willingness to make needed fixes — and even his ability to head the agency's IT organization.
The stinging criticisms levelled at Charbo illustrate the complexity of the challenge he has faced since taking over as CIO of the DHS in July 2005: developing a unified IT infrastructure for the 22 separate agencies that were cobbled together to create the DHS.
Charbo rebutted the charges at a hearing held by the subcommittee, which is investigating cybersecurity vulnerabilities at the DHS. He said that much of the criticism of the agency's security capabilities was based on outdated information that ignored some of the improvements the DHS has made to its IT defences.
"I'm confident that the DHS information security program is moving in the right direction," Charbo said in his prepared testimony. "Although we still have a ways to go, we've made measurable improvements in the management of information security."
But that didn't dissuade legislators such as Bennie Thompson from launching verbal salvos at Charbo. Thompson, who chairs the House Committee on Homeland Security, said he had reviewed Charbo's responses to a series of security-related questions posed by the panel's subcommittee on emerging threats, cybersecurity, and science and technology in advance of the hearing.
Based on the responses, "I think the first thing that Mr Charbo needs to do is explain to us why he should keep his job," Thompson said. "I am not convinced that he's serious about fixing the vulnerabilities in [the DHS's] systems."
Thompson's criticism of Charbo was echoed by James Langevin, the subcommittee's chairman. In his opening remarks at the hearing, Langevin expressed his "shock and disappointment" at learning that the DHS had reported a total of 844 security incidents during the federal government's 2005 and 2006 fiscal years.
Langevin also said he was dismayed by what he claimed was Charbo's unwillingness to invest the needed resources to correct such problems. "The finances show that Mr Charbo and the department's leadership continue to underinvest in IT security," Langevin said.
'Material Weakness'
Adding more fuel to the fire was a report released by the Government Accountability Office, which said it had found pervasive and systemic security problems at the DHS during a year long review.
Among the issues highlighted by the GAO were a "material weakness" in the security controls on financial systems, the lack of an effective agencywide information security program and a continued failure to conduct comprehensive assessments of security risks.
Keith Rhodes, the GAO's chief technologist, said at the hearing that eventually his staff simply stopped looking for more vulnerabilities in the systems at the DHS and its component units because the problems were so widespread.
But Christopher Pierson, a partner at US law firm Lewis and Roca and board member in the local chapter of the FBI's InfraGard security information-sharing program, said that blaming Charbo for all of the problems at the DHS is unwarranted.
"DHS is faced with a unique problem," Pierson said. "It has a patchwork of 22 agencies that have been stitched together, do not share similar systems or security processes, and function very differently."
And until DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff issued a directive in March giving the CIO greater authority over IT on an agency-wide basis, Charbo really didn't have the clout needed to make meaningful changes, Pierson said.
Charbo said during this hearing that the DHS has completed an inventory of its systems and has made significant progress in certifying that they meet Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) standards.
The DHS is also in the midst of three IT consolidation projects that will have a significant impact on security, Charbo said. They include the creation of a single WAN called OneNet, featuring IPsec-based encryption and authentication; the development of an enterprise architecture that consolidates 13 different e-mail and directory systems into one; and the melding of multiple data centres into a shared facility.
In addition, Charbo defended his agency's IT security spending, saying it was on a par with industry standards.
Alan Paller, director of research at the US SANS Institute, said Charbo's record on information security is similar to those of a majority of CIOs at large federal agencies. But, he added, at least some of the FISMA compliance efforts at the DHS appear to have been paperwork exercises that have done little to actually improve security.
Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email CIO
- Follow CIO on twitter
- 5 Best Practices for Achieving Peak Performance in SAP Environments
- OVUM Report: Governance Risk and Compliance-- GRC usage and buying trends in the ANZ markets
- CSO Security Buyers Guide 2011
- Revolutionizing Enterprise Storage Infrastructure with Enterprise Flash Technology
- Justifying Business Intelligence Applications
-
Australia's first 4G smartphone is the HTC Velocity 4G
-
Swedish e-commerce startup's execs linked to NYC sex crime
-
Face Time - Interview with John Brennan and Robert DiStefano
-
How to implement next-generation storage infrastructure for Big Data
-
Pfizer's Future Depends on IT Transformation
-
10 Essential Steps to Email Security
Modern business is reliant on email. All organisations using email need to answer the following questions: How do we control spam volumes without the risk of trapping a business email? How do we prevent infections from email-borne viruses? How do we stop leakage of confidential information? Can we detect and stop exploitation from phishing attacks? How do we control brand damage from occurring due to employee misuse? How do we prevent inappropriate content from being circulated? -
Delivering Tomorrow's Backup and Recovery Infrastructure
The data protection market has changed considerably over the past decade. During this time, the market witnessed a fundamental shift away from relying solely on tape for backup and recovery to using disk-based backup solutions to address challenges including backup performance, reliability, and recovery time objectives. This paper highlights that firms evaluating next-generation data protection solutions must expect a greater degree of integration between the technology components in today's data protection path. -
Using Application Control to Reduce Risk with Endpoint Security
Unwanted applications, like games, result in productivity loss. This is often the primary consideration when applying application control. But unauthorized applications also increase your company’s risks of malware infection and data loss. This paper details how endpoint security solutions that incorporate application control provide the most efficient, comprehensive defense against unauthorized applications.

















Comments
Post new comment