Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

As You Like It

Consistency is not the hobgoblin of little minds; it is the essence of the multi-channel customer interface.

Little Britain, the cult British comedy series, features a character too many people have met in real life. It is the middle-ranking bank officer who produces, then enthuses over, marketing material selling a personal loan or a mortgage. However, when the banker inputs the would-be clients' details into the information system she turns and tells them: "The computer says no."

Thirty years ago it would not have been like that. The bank manager would have known you and your banking history intimately, he would have been able to make a value rather than arbitrary judgment. He would probably have said yes. That is customer service.

Delivering not only good but consistent customer service is easy to do when you live in a village where everyone knows one another. In the global village it is much harder. But it can and is being achieved by forward-thinking enterprises.

These are the enterprises that have realized their branch managers need technology to support (not replace) their decision making; that their organizations also interact with customers online, through call centres, via interactive voice response systems, at vending machines and through franchise operations. At each one of those points these smart enterprises know they need to delight the customer to keep them. They know that even if the customer is generally happy online, in the branch or speaking to a call centre operator one bad experience in voicemail hell and the customer may walk.

Delivering good customer service demands a rich, systemic approach to managing all the touch points between company and customer.

Jeffrey Rayport and Bernard Jaworski, founding members of consulting group Marketspace Global, are the authors of Best Face Forward, a book published in January that looks at how technology is both revolutionizing and humanizing service. However, they warn readers that this requires sensitive management.

"[The] cost and complexity of interface proliferation can create unmanageable collections of touch points for companies while resulting in confusion for customers. That's why we see this as an issue that must be subjected to systems thinking. Unless companies operate their interfaces as a system, the interfaces can become a liability," Rayport says. "Every interface, no matter how seemingly trivial, now represents the expression of the firm's brand and reputation. Managed well they allow companies to lower costs while increasing value to customers; managed poorly they can do the opposite a true double-edged sword."

The whole thing can topple as "an interface system is only as good as its weakest link". This is not a place to cut corners. Rayport says that most weak links seem to occur in the hand-offs from one type of interface to another human to machine, branch office to online, Web site to call centre. It is not so much a dodgy interactive voice response system that wrecks things but a failure to take a systemic view of the interface mesh. This throws up a challenge for CIOs who have to install and manage the technology infrastructure because IT cannot hope to secure a systemic vantage point on its own.

"The kind of changes we recommend to the way companies manage the customer experience requires an overall alignment of strategy and execution that touches all faces of the organization," Rayport says. "It's because it's so major that our sense is that it must be driven from the C-level across the entire firm not relegated to particular silos in the marketing and sales organization as is often the case in many organizations. Indeed considering all interfaces with customers as important empowers the entire organization to deliver at the highest quality and helps bring the culture together."

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: ABC, Baker & McKenzie, Baker & McKenzie, Boss, Boston Consulting, Boston Consulting Group, Coles Myer, Creative, David Jones, eBay, HIS Limited, Interface Technology, Optus, Systems Thinking, Telstra, Unisys, Vantage Point, VIA, Virgin Blue, Vodafone

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Prepare Your Enterprise for the Mobile Revolution: Boost the Bottom Line with Mobile UC
    This white paper will highlight the changes in the mobile workplace; outline the benefits of unified communications (UC) and Fixed-Mobile Convergence (FMC) for mobile workers; identify the key market trends and business challenges IT managers must pay attention to now and into the future; and offer best practices for choosing a solution that will deliver clear ROI.
    Learn more »
  • Managing IBM License Complexity
    IBM provides thousands of products in its portfolio and uses a variety of license models, contract terms and conditions. These license models can be very complex, causing frequent confusion for organisations trying to grasp the concepts while maintaining license compliance. While at first IBM licensing may seem incomprehensible, some education on the license models and licensing scenarios will help minimise the confusion. In addition, a more automated approach to managing licenses enables organisations to gain control, reduce ongoing software costs and minimise license liability risks. Read on.
    Learn more »
  • Oracle Exadata Database Machine Warehouse Architectural Comparisons
    Exadata is Oracle’s fastest growing new product. Much of the growth of Exadata has come at the expense of specialized data warehouse appliance vendors. These vendors have published competitive comparisons to Exadata, claiming: Architecture is what really matters for performance, Purpose-built data warehousing architectures perform best, They see architecture as an end in itself rather than as a means to an end. Read on.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments