Critical.
Authoritative.
Strategic.
Subscribe to CIO Magazine »

How to Take Your Warehouse Wireless

Dorfman Pacific needed to grow, so it needed to get rid of the paper processes that held it back

Reader ROI

  • Why IT needs to research business processes before a rollout
  • How to sell employees on a wireless project
  • The importance of conducting a radio frequency study

For all businesses, growth is a good thing. More sales, more customers, more demand, more revenue. But growth has a funny way of exposing inefficiencies by shining a harsh light on wasteful, entrenched business practices, loosely stitched together by siloed IT systems, that lead to high operational costs and act as roadblocks to real change.

At Dorfman Pacific, a mid-market manufacturer and distributor of headwear and handbags, the business had always been about serving the Mom-and-Pop stores that had constituted the company's customer base since its inception in 1921. But although the company had kept current with fashion, its warehouse processes had scarcely changed during 86 years in the business. Despite technology's march, its warehouse processes remained paper-based and relied on the workers' tacit knowledge of the warehouse and each customer's needs.

But in the late 1980s and on into the 90s, a new sales and distribution channel created room for growth: Dorfman Pacific began selling to the big-box retailers such as Wal-Mart, which craved more of the 25,000 items that the company sold. Dorfman Pacific still sold to the small and midsize retailers, but the split between the two was now about half and half.

What follows is the story of how one company upended every square metre of its warehouse operations and reduced its warehouse labour costs by 30 percent, saving more than $US250,000 a year

As the company sought to expand during this period, its modus operandi showed cracks: The paper-based order-picking processes that served Dorfman's 100,000-square-foot (9290-square-metre) warehouse were too inefficient; the warehouse itself was too small; the use of a temporary workforce and loads of overtime to meet demand peaks meant it incurred huge operational costs; and siloed IT systems offered little computing assistance and inventory visibility. In short, the company's growth had spotlighted the inefficiencies inherent in the way things had always been done.

"In the environment we had, it was a challenge to actually do a good job," says Mark Dulle, the IT services director for Dorfman Pacific, who came on board in 2003. "It was stressful and very difficult to maintain any level of quality and get it right."

Executives at Dorfman Pacific could see the future and knew they faced a challenge in expanding operations using the existing warehouse and technologies. So starting in 2001, top management, most notably CEO Douglass Highsmith, began to push for a big technology-driven change to business as usual. "I don't want to fight technology. I want to embrace it," Highsmith says. "We've got to constantly improve the technology applications of our company." A total revamp of Dorfman's operations, including a complete IT overhaul inside the warehouse, was called for. Paper was out. Wireless was in.

What follows is the story of how one company upended every square metre of its warehouse operations — its interior layout, day-to-day shipping and receiving practices, the equipment workers used and the IT systems enabling it all — and reduced its warehouse labour costs by 30 percent, saving more than $US250,000 a year and vanquishing many inefficiencies that had plagued its operations.

But the road to success wasn't without bumps. "There are things we didn't do right," Dulle admits. For one, he says, the project team pushed too far, too fast on the wireless implementation. As a result, the company didn't meet the initial March 2005 go-live date, which negated the first return on its investment.

What's most notable (and applicable for other CIOs), however, is what Dorfman Pacific did do right: The business side took full responsibility for the project's success; a cross-functional project team determined the overall plan, chose the appropriate technology and managed workers' expectations throughout; and a non-IT sponsor shepherded the entire project. IT was there at every turn but "this was not an IT project. No way", Dulle emphasizes. "This was strictly a business project." Which is why, he believes, it was such a success. Here's how the company did it.

Join the CIO Australia group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

More about: ACT, f2, Finish Line, Scala, Symbol, Symbol Technologies, Wal-Mart, Zebra, Zebra Technologies

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the CIO comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Latest Blog Posts
Whitepapers
  • Justifying Business Intelligence Applications
    This white paper explores the decision criteria used in a build vs. buy scenario when considering the Oracle BI Applications. The major benefits of the BI Applications will be discussed in the framework of an overall buy vs. build argument.
    Learn more »
  • How will CIOs meet growing Security Threats?
    The growing complexity and prevalence of security threats, enabled by consumer IT and mobility, sets the stage for ever more sophisticated attacks. Security must be proactively front and center in all IT deliverables, but CIOs and CSOs must work in concert to succeed in these efforts. In this interactive white paper from CIO Magazine and EMC, learn how tightening the relationship between CIOs and CSOs will help create trust, the foundation of business relationships today. Embedded videos feature Art Coviello, Sanjay Mirchandani, and Dave Martin, and a quick survey provides benchmarking between CIO peers.
    Learn more »
  • Oracle Exadata Database Machine Warehouse Architectural Comparisons
    Exadata is Oracle’s fastest growing new product. Much of the growth of Exadata has come at the expense of specialized data warehouse appliance vendors. These vendors have published competitive comparisons to Exadata, claiming: Architecture is what really matters for performance, Purpose-built data warehousing architectures perform best, They see architecture as an end in itself rather than as a means to an end. Read on.
    Learn more »
All whitepapers
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to Invitation only events CIO, reports & analysis.
Recent comments